2017
DOI: 10.1071/rj15130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of grazing system on rangeland condition and grazing capacity in Zimbabwe

Abstract: The influence of different land tenure and rangeland management systems on rangeland condition and livestock grazing capacity in African rangelands is not well documented. A rangeland condition assessment was carried out at 15 sites located in the communal grazing system, small-scale commercial grazing system and the large-scale commercial grazing system in Zimbabwe. Rangeland indicators assessed were: floristic composition, herbaceous biomass yield, shrub stem density and grazing capacity. Grass species compo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the contribution of different plant functional groups to cattle diets varied widely both within and across years, we did not detect any clear differences in functional group composition between the two grazing treatments that could explain the difference in dietary CP during the first half of the grazing season each year. Rather, cattle foraging-behaviour data indicated that the reduction in diet quality was associated with CARM steers foraging in more linear pathways and moving across shorter distances in each foraging bout, than did TRM steers (Augustine et al 2023), because the 10-fold higher stock density increased inter-animal competition (Popp et al 1997;Rind and Phillips 1999;Gusha et al 2017). In contrast, TRM cattle foraged in pathways with greater tortuosity and moved over a longer distance during each foraging bout (Augustine et al 2023), which suggests that they more selectively consume bites with less standing dead vegetation and more green leaves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the contribution of different plant functional groups to cattle diets varied widely both within and across years, we did not detect any clear differences in functional group composition between the two grazing treatments that could explain the difference in dietary CP during the first half of the grazing season each year. Rather, cattle foraging-behaviour data indicated that the reduction in diet quality was associated with CARM steers foraging in more linear pathways and moving across shorter distances in each foraging bout, than did TRM steers (Augustine et al 2023), because the 10-fold higher stock density increased inter-animal competition (Popp et al 1997;Rind and Phillips 1999;Gusha et al 2017). In contrast, TRM cattle foraged in pathways with greater tortuosity and moved over a longer distance during each foraging bout (Augustine et al 2023), which suggests that they more selectively consume bites with less standing dead vegetation and more green leaves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low proportion of highly palatable grasses observed in Avalon and Clovelly soil types indicates preferential grazing, which if allowed to continue may result in local extinction of these desirable forage species [26]. Gusha et al [47] also stated that the reduction of desirable species may be due to frequent defoliation under continuous grazing systems.…”
Section: Grass Species Composition and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%