2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13441-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of globalization, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in Bangladesh: Does institutional quality matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
3
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our empirical evidence is further supported by Pata ( 2018a ), who found that energy consumption contributes to escalate environmental degradation in Turkey over the period 1974–2013. Aslan et al ( 2021 ) found similar results for 17 Mediterranean countries, Doğanlar et al ( 2021 ) for Turkey, Udeagha and Breitenbach ( 2021 ) for SADC countries, Hongxing et al ( 2021 ) for 81 BRI 8 economies, Hu et al ( 2021 ) for Guangdong, China, Udeagha and Ngepah ( 2021b ) for South Africa, and Islam et al ( 2021 ) for Bangladesh. Our findings, however, contradict those of Baloch et al ( 2021 ), who found that energy innovation lowers energy intensity and, as a result, CO 2 emissions in OECD nations.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Their Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our empirical evidence is further supported by Pata ( 2018a ), who found that energy consumption contributes to escalate environmental degradation in Turkey over the period 1974–2013. Aslan et al ( 2021 ) found similar results for 17 Mediterranean countries, Doğanlar et al ( 2021 ) for Turkey, Udeagha and Breitenbach ( 2021 ) for SADC countries, Hongxing et al ( 2021 ) for 81 BRI 8 economies, Hu et al ( 2021 ) for Guangdong, China, Udeagha and Ngepah ( 2021b ) for South Africa, and Islam et al ( 2021 ) for Bangladesh. Our findings, however, contradict those of Baloch et al ( 2021 ), who found that energy innovation lowers energy intensity and, as a result, CO 2 emissions in OECD nations.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Their Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Meanwhile, the commitment of these and a few other nations is critical to reducing global CO 2 emissions. However, because energy usage is essential for economic growth and CO 2 emissions are linked to it, lowering CO 2 emissions would result in lower output, which would slow economic growth (Islam et al 2021 ). This circumstance makes it extremely difficult for these countries to commit to or follow through on programs that are explicitly meant to reduce global CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamilton and Kelly (2017) opt for a multi-sector reform, which is important for the whole climate change policy, while Sharma et al (2021b) suggested shaping a multipronged policy framework that allows to consider the need for complementarity between economic growth and environmental goals. Policymakers should promote cooperation with other countries and multinational corporations when introducing pro-environmental actions (Islam et al 2021) and global economies are recommended to strive for integrating policies for emission reduction with the ones related to economic growth (Rehman et al 2021). As summarized by Wiśniewski and Kistowski (2018), it is necessary to look at agriculture and rural areas more broadly when introducing low-carbon economy plans and strategies because agriculture (including forestry) has the potential to sequester carbon and reduce GHG emissions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The people who have primary education niether care about environmental pollutions nor even prefer to use modern eco-friendly technologies. The globalization has negative impact on carbon emissions (Islam et al, 2021;Sharif et al, 2020;Bu et al, 2016). It means that globalization is not harmful to environmental degradation in Pakistan.…”
Section: Figure 3 Dynamic Multiplier Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%