Impact of e-court systems implementation: a case study

Ahmed, Rozha K.; Muhammed, Khder H.; Pappel, Ingrid; Draheim, Dirk

doi:10.1108/tg-01-2020-0008

Cited by 14 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We consider it necessary to note that understanding of the necessity of digitalization in the judicial system emerged after the digitalization of public administration and providing various public services via any electronic devices on accessible and comprehensible digital platforms [31][32][33][34][35].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of digital technologies in the administration of justice in the field of environmental crime

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the present paper the authors consider technological and legal problems that arise in the course of adopting information technology in legal proceedings. The authors analyze the efficiency of using digital technologies in the administration of justice within the crisis period of 2020 on the basis of the World Justice Project, worked out by the Council of European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice CEPEJ. These technologies are used by both courts of the Russian Federation and courts of some other countries. The paper presents the analysis of prospects to apply artificial intelligence in the work of courts during adjudication on certain categories of disputes (issuance of a court order, consideration of cases as summary judgment proceedings). In order to ensure accessibility of justice, the authors urge on necessity to turn to online legal proceedings; they also highlight the necessity to organize special legal services for individuals (free-of-charge) and for business entities. The paper calls for the urgency to create a special digital portal for pretrial settlement of disputes between legal entities.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of digital technologies in the administration of justice in the field of environmental crime

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…El Derecho, en todos sus aspectos, está siendo renovado y trastocado por las nuevas tecnologías informáticas y, en particular, por la inteligencia artificial, por el uso de algoritmos que permiten tomar datos (los inputs) y producir resultados relevantes (los outputs) siguiendo diversas etapas que requieren cálculos, operaciones lógicas, comparaciones estadísticas o analogías. En ese contexto, el derecho procesal, estructurado según fórmulas de procedimientos, ceñidos a formas y plazos en donde la dirigencia del juzgador se nutre y se sustenta en base a las pruebas que pueden ser aportadas por las partes en conflicto, se convierte en un terreno fértil para implementar la inteligencia artificial como una herramienta muy adecuada para simplificar mucho de estos procedimientos, aportar análisis previos y poder aportar una base de datos con la acumulación de elementos probatorios, que permitan la gestión mucho más optimizada de estos elementos lo que permitiría el juzgador tener un acercamiento más adecuado a la verdad buscada en todo ese conjunto de trámites y procesos (Ahmed et al, 2021). Tal es así, que en el caso del proceso penal, la inteligencia artificial se convierte en el aliado más importante que podrían tener los operadores jurídicos para encontrar una respuesta más eficaz de la justicia penal, en tiempos más cortos y con un mayor nivel de asertividad jurídica que facilitaría desde todo punto de vista, mejorar la calidad de las decisiones judiciales (List, 2021).…”

Section: Inteligencia Artificial Y Justicia Penalunclassified

implementación de la Inteligencia Artificial en las decisiones judiciales en procesos penales

Sanchez Ronceros

2024

RJChornancap

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La Inteligencia Artificial (IA) se utiliza en el proceso penal de diversas maneras. En primer lugar, se emplea para analizar grandes cantidades de datos y evidencia, acelerando la revisión de casos y la identificación de patrones relevantes. Esto puede ser especialmente útil en la detección de delitos financieros, fraudes y otros crímenes complejos. Además, la IA puede ayudar a predecir el riesgo de reincidencia de un delincuente, lo que puede influir en la toma de decisiones sobre la libertad condicional. Sin embargo, la implementación de la IA en las decisiones judiciales plantea desafíos éticos y legales. La falta de transparencia en los algoritmos utilizados y el riesgo de sesgos son preocupaciones importantes. Además, existe un debate sobre el papel que debe desempeñar la IA en las decisiones finales de un juez, ya que la toma de decisiones judiciales involucra a menudo aspectos subjetivos y contextuales que la IA puede no comprender completamente. En síntesis, el equilibrio entre la automatización y el juicio humano sigue siendo un tema de debate en la comunidad legal, algo que, a través del presente artículo se pretende ir dilucidando en intención al interés cada vez mayor sobre esta materia.

show abstract

“…Some states have been using online courts long before the pandemic such as New South Wales, Australia which created CourtLink in the late 1990s to document management and communication and conduct its first online court hearing in 2006 (Legg, 2021). The use of digital litigation provides several conveniences such as online accessibility, punctuality, transparency, data accuracy, secure access to files and information, etc (Ahmed et al, 2021). Some other benefits of this system, which is tagged 4K, include speed, accuracy, reliability, and consistency (Kurniawan, 2020).…”

Section: The Trend Of Bank's Small Claims Cases During Covid-19 Pandemicmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Small Claim Courts During Covid-19: Analysis of Indonesian Banks’ Claims on Bad Credit

Pati,

Tejomurti,

Pujiyono

et al. 2024

UUMJLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to discuss the suitability of small claim courts to solve bad credit claims that are filed by banks as an alternative to dispute contract defaults. The study analyses the trend of banks’ small claims during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study employed an empirical normative approach. It combines a normative legal approach and additional empirical elements in the form of cases and decisions. The results show that some of the regulations that were released before the pandemic, such as the Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2019 on the Settlement of Small Claim Courts, provide benefits for banks to settle credit disputes because they allow various expansions. The Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2018 on The Administration of Cases in Electronic Courts has introduced some electronic applications. Although business (bank) litigation remains dominant, the trend of bank claims in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic has dropped. In contrast, the trend of individual claims has increased significantly. The decline is influenced by countercyclical policies that are issued by the Financial System Stability Committee. The committee members consist of representatives of the Ministry of Finance, Bank Indonesia, the Financial Services Authority, and the Deposit Insurance Corporation. It aims to handle and cope with the banks’ crisis related to the pandemic.

show abstract

Impact of e-court systems implementation: a case study

Cited by 14 publications

References 39 publications

The use of digital technologies in the administration of justice in the field of environmental crime

The use of digital technologies in the administration of justice in the field of environmental crime

implementación de la Inteligencia Artificial en las decisiones judiciales en procesos penales

The Small Claim Courts During Covid-19: Analysis of Indonesian Banks’ Claims on Bad Credit

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About