2019
DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbz008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of direct payments on agricultural land use in less-favoured areas: evidence from Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The farm fixed effect controls for any farm characteristics that cannot be observed, such as landscapes with different agro-climatic conditions, do not change over time and that may influence farm production outcomes. The inclusion of the year fixed effect, ψ t , in Equation (1), is to control for shocks common to all the farms, for example, changes in market signals to all farms and price volatility [55,56]. Several factors confound the identification of the causal impact of decoupled payments on farm-level production [13,14,19].…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The farm fixed effect controls for any farm characteristics that cannot be observed, such as landscapes with different agro-climatic conditions, do not change over time and that may influence farm production outcomes. The inclusion of the year fixed effect, ψ t , in Equation (1), is to control for shocks common to all the farms, for example, changes in market signals to all farms and price volatility [55,56]. Several factors confound the identification of the causal impact of decoupled payments on farm-level production [13,14,19].…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, as previous studies have conducted analyses via case studies or descriptive statistics, rigorous empirical evidence on the effects of DPs in LFAs on farmland use is limited. The exceptions are two recent studies by Takayama et al (2020) and Ito et al (2019). Takayama et al (2020) use rural community-level panel data in Japan and find that, although DPs for HMAs fostered continued land use and prevented farmland abandonment through the maintenance of farm households and household members, these effects are modest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The exceptions are two recent studies by Takayama et al (2020) and Ito et al (2019). Takayama et al (2020) use rural community-level panel data in Japan and find that, although DPs for HMAs fostered continued land use and prevented farmland abandonment through the maintenance of farm households and household members, these effects are modest. Ito et al (2019) also focus on Japanese rural communities in a limited number of regions and find that DPs deter farmland abandonment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations