2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of different inoculum sources on the performance of membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment: Dynamic membrane versus ultrafiltration membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was because SS addition to the FW reduced the fraction of small particles which are < 1 μm in the feedstock while the fraction of larger particles > 100 μm was increased. It is known that small particles can deposit on the membrane surface and block the membrane pores (Isik et al 2022). Therefore, besides the biological synergistic effect of codigestion, physical synergistic effects are visible that are especially important for the AnMBR systems.…”
Section: Sludge Streammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was because SS addition to the FW reduced the fraction of small particles which are < 1 μm in the feedstock while the fraction of larger particles > 100 μm was increased. It is known that small particles can deposit on the membrane surface and block the membrane pores (Isik et al 2022). Therefore, besides the biological synergistic effect of codigestion, physical synergistic effects are visible that are especially important for the AnMBR systems.…”
Section: Sludge Streammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another application that might be a solution for the membrane fouling faced during co-digestion by AnMBRs is using DM in AnMBR. DM is a secondary filtration layer that forms a low-cost support material by the deposition of solid particles and microbial cells (Isik et al 2022). DM can be repeatedly formed on the lowcost support material and thus this can be a potential solution for the permeability loss that is observed in conventional membranes (Lee et al 2001).…”
Section: Sludge Streammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membranes are commonly used in water treatment systems due to their small footprint, reasonable operating costs, high selective separation efficiency, and high quality of final permeate 1 3 . Membrane filtration is a versatile technology that can be coupled with other water separation systems, including micro- and ultra-filtration in bioreactors, where it represents an autonomous substitute for secondary clarifiers and nanofiltration in the treatment of drinking water 4 , 5 . An important obstacle impeding the development of membranes as the primary option in water treatment systems, however, is (bio)fouling 4 , 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%