2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2022.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of COVID-19 on Acute Myocardial Infarction Care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 25 Previous reports have demonstrated a delay and/or complexities in care due to sheer volume and immensely stretched resources during the peak of pandemic. 2 , 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 25 Previous reports have demonstrated a delay and/or complexities in care due to sheer volume and immensely stretched resources during the peak of pandemic. 2 , 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both in Canada and the US, as occurred globally, the COVID-19 pandemic adversely impacted STEMI care. 13 , 14 On the background of traditionally different health care systems and compounded by differences in how the pandemic was managed in Canada and the US, understanding how STEMI outcomes compare between these 2 countries has health policy implications. Various pre-COVID-19 comparisons have historically described how variations in health care between Canada and the US are associated with STEMI presentations and outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the observations made with HF hospitalizations at the onset of the pandemic, hospitalizations for chest pain and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) fell precipitously at the onset of the pandemic-including a marked reduction in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) activations and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volumes. 89,[131][132][133] Furthermore, a significant fall in emergency transfers for acute cardiovascular conditions, including STEMI, was identified in Cleveland in March through May of 2020. 134 Despite this, interventional cardiologists prepared to adapt to a changing landscape in the delivery of cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) care through guidance put forth by professional societies on how to approach STEMI, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and elective interventions.…”
Section: Acute Coronary Syndromes and Cardiac Catheterization Laborat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…170,171 The need for mechanical circulatory support in COVID-19 STEMI patients who developed cardiogenic shock was also associated with excessive mortality rates. 133,172 The decision to pursue these aggressive interventions in this population should be highly selective and offered after consideration by a multidisciplinary team. [172][173][174]…”
Section: Acute Coronary Syndromes and Cardiac Catheterization Laborat...mentioning
confidence: 99%