2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10562-007-9160-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Boron Modification on MCM-41-Supported Cobalt Catalysts for Hydrogenation of Carbon Monoxide

Abstract: Boron modification on MCM-41-supported cobalt (Co) catalysts was found to decrease the catalyst activity during CO hydrogenation. The decreased activities were due to stronger support interaction between Co oxide species and the support with the presence of boron resulting in lower reducibility. However, based on methanation the selectivity to C 2 -C 4 products slightly increased with low loading of boron.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary objective has been maximizing waxy hydrocarbons and improving catalyst stability through understanding support structure effects [1][2][3][4][5], the role of promoters-such as noble metals (Pt, Ru, Pd, Re, Rh) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], Group 11 metals (Cu, Ag, and Au) [18], alkali promoters (Li, Na, K, Cs) [19,20], and rare earth (La, Ce, Th) [21,22] as well as other oxides (Zr, Mo, B, and Mn) [21][22][23][24][25], and Co particle size effects [25][26][27][28][29]. The strong interaction between Co and the Al 2 O 3 support results in a better Co dispersion than moderate and weak interactions between Co and TiO 2 , and Co and SiO 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary objective has been maximizing waxy hydrocarbons and improving catalyst stability through understanding support structure effects [1][2][3][4][5], the role of promoters-such as noble metals (Pt, Ru, Pd, Re, Rh) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], Group 11 metals (Cu, Ag, and Au) [18], alkali promoters (Li, Na, K, Cs) [19,20], and rare earth (La, Ce, Th) [21,22] as well as other oxides (Zr, Mo, B, and Mn) [21][22][23][24][25], and Co particle size effects [25][26][27][28][29]. The strong interaction between Co and the Al 2 O 3 support results in a better Co dispersion than moderate and weak interactions between Co and TiO 2 , and Co and SiO 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N2 physisorption and reaction study. [17,[19][20][21]. The observed short-broaden peaks suggested the good dispersion of Co3O4 and CoAl2O4 species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The reduction peak for the CoCL sample was located at ca. 450 o C. All the peaks observed were assigned to the overlap of two step reduction of Co3O4 to CoO and, then to Co metal [17,[19][20][21]. Upon the TPR conditions, the two-step reduction may or may not be observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, the strong XRD peak at 29°(overlap with the XRD peak for the monoclinic phase of ZrO 2 ) was detected for the zirconia supports with B modification also assigning to the B 2 O 3 species [24]. Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of different zirconia-supported cobalt catalysts consisting of In order to study the morphologies and elemental distribution of the catalyst samples, SEM and EDX were performed, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%