Impact of Argumentative Negotiation on Collaborative Engineering

Jin, Yan; Geslin, Mathieu; Lu, Stephen C.-Y.

doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.043

Cited by 12 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Worksheets were collected at the end of the session. Other researchers use similar methodologies to study design [5,12].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other applications of language in engineering design include the use of syntax and semantics to evaluate conceptual models [3] and to exchange information for decision-making [5]. Our work in biomimetic/biologically inspired design uses natural-language analysis techniques to retrieve relevant biological analogies as stimuli for design [6,7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Design methods using opposition include TRIZ [11] and argumentative negotiation [5]. In TRIZ (a Russian acronym for the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving), the problem is phrased in contradictions to identify parameters to be improved and those degraded as a consequence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Use of opposite-relation lexical stimuli in concept generation

Chiu

Shu

2008

CIRP Annals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Worksheets were collected at the end of the session. Other researchers use similar methodologies to study design [5,12].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Use of opposite-relation lexical stimuli in concept generation

Chiu

Shu

2008

CIRP Annals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This facilitates the treatment of several DA. Another advantage of aggregation process is that it represents a mean of negotiating different and usually conflicting design objectives, which facilitate information exchange, mutual understanding, and joint decision-making in collaborative development [12].…”

Section: Overall Desirability Indicator (Odi)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring design space in embodiment design with consideration of models accuracy

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International audienceRework tasks in collaborative development projects dealing with immature design concepts are very frequent and are responsible of cost overruns and schedule delays. Taking into account uncertainty and accuracy of models (and data) improves decision making according to strategic orientation for product development. Based on a real design of light, slender but rigid collectors’ supports, multiple tools have been developed and tested to support decision making at different stages of development process. The objective of this paper is to investigate the integration of these accuracy evaluations into the design process. This proposal is validated by the industrial development and validation

show abstract

“…Practicing collaborative design and negotiation dialogue has been found to be positively linked with argument development and critical thinking skills (Smith 1977, Hart 1990, Jin et al 2005, Marttunen 1992). Furthermore, the work of 724 N. Jing and S.C.-Y.…”

Section: Argument Structure: Toulmin's Structure Of Argumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Structure arguments for collaborative negotiation of group decisions in manufacturing systems integration

Jing

2010

International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To support the collaboration negotiation of group decision-making activities in manufacturing systems integration, the authors have developed an approach to structure the negotiation argument with identified and organised objectives and preferences. This paper reviews relevant research work and presents the framework and methods of this approach. To overcome the limitations of these works in structuring argument for effective collaborative negotiation, our approach synthesises a value-focused objective hierarchy with the generic argument structure to specify how the arguments can be generated based on stakeholders' proposals, objectives, criteria and preferences, and then exchanged amongst multiple stakeholders. This synthesis framework also helps us suggest operational methods to evaluate the arguments based on the level of the objectives achievement. In addition, this paper describes a prototype system which implements our approach using the advanced web-based software technologies with the goal of demonstrating how to systematically carry out effective collaborative negotiation of group decisions in manufacturing systems integration.

show abstract

Impact of Argumentative Negotiation on Collaborative Engineering

Cited by 12 publications

References 3 publications

Use of opposite-relation lexical stimuli in concept generation

Use of opposite-relation lexical stimuli in concept generation

Exploring design space in embodiment design with consideration of models accuracy

Structure arguments for collaborative negotiation of group decisions in manufacturing systems integration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About