2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of opposite-relation lexical stimuli in concept generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants who chose at least one opposite term developed more novel concepts. For one of the problems, the increase in novelty was statistically significant (Chiu & Shu, 2008). Since this most recent previous study was a penand-paper experiment where only final results were collected, the follow-up think-aloud experiment reported here will provide more insight into the use of dichotomous stimuli in concept generation.…”
Section: Dichotomies In Language Reasoning and Designmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Participants who chose at least one opposite term developed more novel concepts. For one of the problems, the increase in novelty was statistically significant (Chiu & Shu, 2008). Since this most recent previous study was a penand-paper experiment where only final results were collected, the follow-up think-aloud experiment reported here will provide more insight into the use of dichotomous stimuli in concept generation.…”
Section: Dichotomies In Language Reasoning and Designmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The relatively small number of participants in think-aloud studies is generally accepted, provided other methods are used in conjunction (Visser, 2006), which we have and reported elsewhere (Chiu & Shu, 2007b;Chiu & Shu, 2008).…”
Section: Think-aloud Experiments In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first experiment was a pen-and-paper experiment involving 42 fourth-year engineering students (Chiu and Shu, 2008a). Stimuli were verbs oppositely and similarly related to the functional keywords of each problem generated using various thesauri (e.g., Oxford, 2003), and to other words in the stimulus set.…”
Section: Experiments 1 -Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%