2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2018.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of anonymity on roles of personal and group identities in online communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When individuals maintain persistent identities over time that capture prior behaviors or details about certain skills (as in the case of identified contributors), interactions in FDP could also encourage them to develop bond-based attachment (Ren et al, 2012). Social interaction and personal information constitute critical ingredients for developing strong bonds, which will ultimately allow developers to trust and understand one another better (Kim et al, 2019). Furthermore, reputation, identity, and peer effects will predominate in this case as developers seek to build their reputation among the peers, which will result in more technical, detailed FDP that adhere to the group's strict norms and, thus, help project performance by focusing developers' efforts (Roberts et al, 2006;Shah, 2006).…”
Section: Volume 12 Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When individuals maintain persistent identities over time that capture prior behaviors or details about certain skills (as in the case of identified contributors), interactions in FDP could also encourage them to develop bond-based attachment (Ren et al, 2012). Social interaction and personal information constitute critical ingredients for developing strong bonds, which will ultimately allow developers to trust and understand one another better (Kim et al, 2019). Furthermore, reputation, identity, and peer effects will predominate in this case as developers seek to build their reputation among the peers, which will result in more technical, detailed FDP that adhere to the group's strict norms and, thus, help project performance by focusing developers' efforts (Roberts et al, 2006;Shah, 2006).…”
Section: Volume 12 Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While researchers have theoretically (Anonymous, 1998;Rains & Scott, 2007;Reicher et al, 1995) and empirically (Jackson et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2019;Klein, Spears, & Reicher, 2007;Kolbitsch, 2006;Pisonneault & Heppel, 1997;Postmes, Spears, Sakhel, & de Groot, 2001;Tanis & Postmes, 2007) examined the role that anonymity plays in group-level outcomes, we lack knowledge about how APC per se affect OSS projects' performance. Some studies suggest a negative relationship between anonymous participation and group outcomes (Kim et al, 2019;Zimbardo, 1969), some suggest a positive relationship (Postmes et al, 2001;Reicher et al, 1995), and still others suggest contingencies that alter the relationship (Ren et al, 2007). In this section, we review these studies as a foundation to develop hypotheses to further understand the role that APC play in open and distributed innovation projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when given anonymity, not all individuals behave immorally; some tend to behave rather pro-socially [12]. In today's online environment, anonymity is inevitably required; thus, interest in various disciplines, including management information systems (MISs), psychology, and communication fields, is growing in terms of what controls people's socially friendly behavior, such as knowledge sharing in anonymous VCs [13][14][15]. Some scholars have begun to investigate the aspects related to self in controlling people to engage in pro-social behaviors, given online anonymity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars have begun to investigate the aspects related to self in controlling people to engage in pro-social behaviors, given online anonymity. Although anonymity provides an environment that hides users' real identities, scholars assert that even in this anonymous environment, people's aspects of self can be important factors in behavioral control [12,14,16]. However, conclusions from existing studies on anonymity and self are inconsistent because they primarily emphasize only partial aspects of the self without considering the whole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%