2007
DOI: 10.2341/06-107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Adhesive Application to Wet and Dry Dentin on Long-term Resin-dentin Bond Strengths

Abstract: ©Operative Dentistry, 2007, 32-4, 380-387 SUMMARYThis study compared the effects of moisture and rubbing action on the immediate and one-year microtensile bond strength (BS) of an ethanol/water-based adhesive system (Single Bond [SB]) and an acetone-based system (One Step [OS]) to dentin. A flat superficial dentin surface on 60 human molars was exposed by wet abrasion. Two coats of the adhesives were applied on either a dry (D) or rewetted surface (W) with no (NRA), slight (SRA) or vigorous rubbing action … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0
17

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
66
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…During SE bonding, dissolved hydroxyapatite crystals are incorporated into the hybridized complex, and, depending on the pH of the adhesive system, the whole extension of demineralized dentin is impregnated by resin monomers (2). For this reason, the SE strategy has not been considered highly sensitive to moisture and drying (7). However, although the number of clinical steps is reduced with SE systems, the longevity of the restoration may be compromised compared with that produced by ER systems, especially when simplified versions of these adhesives (one-step systems) are used (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During SE bonding, dissolved hydroxyapatite crystals are incorporated into the hybridized complex, and, depending on the pH of the adhesive system, the whole extension of demineralized dentin is impregnated by resin monomers (2). For this reason, the SE strategy has not been considered highly sensitive to moisture and drying (7). However, although the number of clinical steps is reduced with SE systems, the longevity of the restoration may be compromised compared with that produced by ER systems, especially when simplified versions of these adhesives (one-step systems) are used (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Chan and others found bond strength to dentin with a thick smear layer increased significantly with agitation and, on SEM evaluation, they noted passive application resulted in a hybridized smear layer, while agitation resulted in the smear layer being completely dissolved or dispersed into the adhesive. 11 Reis and others 41 concluded that the rubbing action can improve the kinetics and allow for better monomer diffusion inward, while solvents are diffusing outward, which may explain the high bond strength values obtained under slight and vigorous agitation. It is likely that vigorous agitation improved the removal of residual water, which increased the degree of conversion and cross-linking of the polymer and, consequently, the mechanical properties of the resin inside the hybrid layer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most in vitro tests, there are variations in the period of storage, which can be 24 hours, a week, two weeks, 3, 6 or 12 months [18,11,19]. The storage time in the present study was 24 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific literature contains studies reporting a reduction in infiltration based on the use of adhesive systems [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] over a short-term assessment period. Thus, shortterm results are material-dependent, given that long-term assessments have shown that the adhesive is not the dominant factor in terms of reducing infiltration around amalgam restorations [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%