Abstract:The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is spreading around the world, and Taiwan is no exception. Faced with the outbreak of the epidemic, the Taiwan government immediately ordered a policy banning indoor dining. The main purpose of the present research is to extend a Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) theoretical framework to explore the public perception toward banning indoor dining policy on restaurant avoidance behavior during the COVID-19 outbreak. An online survey was administered in Taiwan during the COV… Show more
“…Through no fault of their own, restaurant owners witnessed revenues declining rapidly and noticed how once familiar customers developed a fear of indoor dining. Given the anxiety and concern of restaurant customers about their safety and health, customers now request different types of non-contact services, which are critical to controlling the spread of infection (Chen et al , 2021). Consumer fear of a product – or service – is not unique to the hospitality industry.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, public fears of contracting COVID-19 in restaurants contributed to the decline of restaurant patrons. The spread of COVID-19 led to a sudden and temporary sharp drop in revenue for companies in many industries, the most severe being the hospitality industry (Chen et al , 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To retain consumers in the endings phase, restaurants adapted and began to dispel COVID-19 transmission risks by incorporating increased distance between tables, moving seated dining outdoors, or only providing takeaway options (Sigala, 2020). People recognized the increased risk of infection when they dined out inside a restaurant, so they chose to cook at home, thus avoiding the decision-making behavior of going to the establishment (Chen et al , 2021). Although dining at home is not considered a creative solution, the increase in this activity during the pandemic demonstrates Bridges and Mitchel's (2000) transition theory that people must spend time in the neutral zone to determine a clear path forward new beginnings stage.…”
PurposeThis study investigates restaurant patrons' comfort level with the sudden shift in the dining-in climate within the state of Massachusetts during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.Design/methodology/approachAn exploratory study utilized learning algorithms via gradient boosting techniques on surveyed restaurant patrons to identify which restaurant operational attributes and patron demographics predict in-dining comfort levels.FindingsPast consumers' eating habits determine how much their behavior will change during a pandemic. However, their dining-in frequency is not a predictor of their post-pandemic dining-in outlook. The individuals who were more comfortable dining in prior to the pandemic dined in more often during the COVID pandemic. However, they had a poorer outlook on when dining in would return to normal. Although there are no clear indicators of when and how customers will embrace the new norm (a combination of pre-, peri-, and post-pandemic), the results show that some innovative approaches, such as limiting service offerings, are not well accepted by customers.Practical implicationsThe study offers several managerial implications for foodservice providers (i.e. restaurants, delivery services, pick-up) and investors. In particular, the study provides insights into the cognitive factors that determine diners' behavioral change in response to a pandemic and their comfort level. Operators must pay attention to these factors and consider different offering strategies when preparing to operate their business amid a pandemic.Originality/valueThis is a study of a specific location and period. It was conducted in Massachusetts before a vaccine was available. The restaurant industry was beset with uncertainty. It fills a gap in the current literature focused on the COVID-19 pandemic in customers' transition from pre-COVID-19 dining-in behaviors to customers' refreshed COVID-19 outlook and industry compliance with newly established hygiene and safety standards.
“…Through no fault of their own, restaurant owners witnessed revenues declining rapidly and noticed how once familiar customers developed a fear of indoor dining. Given the anxiety and concern of restaurant customers about their safety and health, customers now request different types of non-contact services, which are critical to controlling the spread of infection (Chen et al , 2021). Consumer fear of a product – or service – is not unique to the hospitality industry.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, public fears of contracting COVID-19 in restaurants contributed to the decline of restaurant patrons. The spread of COVID-19 led to a sudden and temporary sharp drop in revenue for companies in many industries, the most severe being the hospitality industry (Chen et al , 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To retain consumers in the endings phase, restaurants adapted and began to dispel COVID-19 transmission risks by incorporating increased distance between tables, moving seated dining outdoors, or only providing takeaway options (Sigala, 2020). People recognized the increased risk of infection when they dined out inside a restaurant, so they chose to cook at home, thus avoiding the decision-making behavior of going to the establishment (Chen et al , 2021). Although dining at home is not considered a creative solution, the increase in this activity during the pandemic demonstrates Bridges and Mitchel's (2000) transition theory that people must spend time in the neutral zone to determine a clear path forward new beginnings stage.…”
PurposeThis study investigates restaurant patrons' comfort level with the sudden shift in the dining-in climate within the state of Massachusetts during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.Design/methodology/approachAn exploratory study utilized learning algorithms via gradient boosting techniques on surveyed restaurant patrons to identify which restaurant operational attributes and patron demographics predict in-dining comfort levels.FindingsPast consumers' eating habits determine how much their behavior will change during a pandemic. However, their dining-in frequency is not a predictor of their post-pandemic dining-in outlook. The individuals who were more comfortable dining in prior to the pandemic dined in more often during the COVID pandemic. However, they had a poorer outlook on when dining in would return to normal. Although there are no clear indicators of when and how customers will embrace the new norm (a combination of pre-, peri-, and post-pandemic), the results show that some innovative approaches, such as limiting service offerings, are not well accepted by customers.Practical implicationsThe study offers several managerial implications for foodservice providers (i.e. restaurants, delivery services, pick-up) and investors. In particular, the study provides insights into the cognitive factors that determine diners' behavioral change in response to a pandemic and their comfort level. Operators must pay attention to these factors and consider different offering strategies when preparing to operate their business amid a pandemic.Originality/valueThis is a study of a specific location and period. It was conducted in Massachusetts before a vaccine was available. The restaurant industry was beset with uncertainty. It fills a gap in the current literature focused on the COVID-19 pandemic in customers' transition from pre-COVID-19 dining-in behaviors to customers' refreshed COVID-19 outlook and industry compliance with newly established hygiene and safety standards.
“…COVID-19 disrupted the U.S. food environment in multiple ways. After March 2020, access to amounts and types of food, and food settings, shifted due to supply disruptions, lock-downs, business closures, lost wages and unemployment, and the avoidance of public contacts and spaces [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Many news and non-profit organizations reported increased demand at food pantries, food waste from farming outputs, and restaurant closures.…”
“…Depending on the reason for restaurant dining, the choice of restaurant [ 2 ], as well as meal [ 3 ], is determined by various factors. During the current global coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic [ 4 ], which has significantly influenced nutritional behaviors and altered the food preferences and food choice determinants [ 5 ] of individuals, the ban on indoor dining in restaurants greatly affected social life [ 6 ]. However, dining out was partially replaced by online food ordering from restaurants, which has also been linked with specific meal choice determinants [ 7 ].…”
Food neophobia, a condition characterized by a reluctance or avoidance of unknown foods and meals, may influence food choice, and is also associated with body mass and familiarity with food items. This study aimed to analyze the associations between food neophobia, familiarity with French cuisine, body mass, and French restaurant menu food choices in a sample of 203 young Polish women. The Computer-Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) method was used in the study. The food choice questionnaire used for assessment was based on a model French restaurant menu, with dishes planned using a 2 × 2 factorial design for the components of neophobic potential (unfamiliar to Polish consumers) and animal-based components. Food neophobia, familiarity with French cuisine, and body mass were considered independent variables. The food neophobia scale (FNS) developed by Pliner and Hobden was used to assess food neophobia among respondents. The results showed an association between food neophobia and familiarity with French cuisine and French restaurant menu food choices (p ≤ 0.05), but no association with body mass was observed (p > 0.05). The respondents with a high level of food neophobia chose dishes with neophobic components (for soups and desserts) less often compared to those with a low neophobia level, and in the absence of such an association, they chose dishes with animal-based components (for starters and main courses) less often (p ≤ 0.05). The respondents who declared that they were familiar with French cuisine chose dishes with animal-based components (for starters and desserts) more often than those with no familiarity, but a reverse association was observed for soups (p ≤ 0.05). Based on the findings of the study, it may be concluded that food neophobia and familiarity with French cuisine may be important determinants of food choice within a French restaurant menu. The study did not show any association between body mass and the choice of dishes from the model French restaurant menu. The findings suggest that the presence of unfamiliar and animal-based ingredients may reduce the frequency of choosing specific dishes within a French restaurant menu, which may reduce the diversity of individuals’ diets.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.