1990
DOI: 10.1109/55.62988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact ionization rates in (100) A1 0.48 In 0.52 As

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…was calculated using the expression of Kuvås and Lee [8], valid for large values of gain and conveniently independent of carrier velocities, using values for the ionization coefficients ratio taken from the work of Watanabe et al [12]. The factor [11] results from a calculation in [8] which assumes local ionization and depends on the ratio of ionization coefficients.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was calculated using the expression of Kuvås and Lee [8], valid for large values of gain and conveniently independent of carrier velocities, using values for the ionization coefficients ratio taken from the work of Watanabe et al [12]. The factor [11] results from a calculation in [8] which assumes local ionization and depends on the ratio of ionization coefficients.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After elimination of the pre-amplifier background contribution, the avalanche noise is computed. The resulting excess noise factor versus multiplication factor is well fitted by McIntire curve with F=M0.67 [6], and thus is in good agreement with Watanabe ionization rates measurements [3].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The responsivity versus reverse voltage is plotted on figure 1, where we can verify that no multiplication occurs before the complete depletion of the absorption layer. This is the condition to benefit from the larger ionization rates ratio at lower multiplication field in AlInAs [3]. The responsivity increases from 0.6 A/W at 18 V, corresponding to a gain of 1 of the 1 pm thick pin structure ( there was no anti-reflection coating on this photodiode), to more than 8 A N at about 24 V ( h=1.55 pm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 The holes in InP, InAlAs, and GaAs simply possess one value of the deformation potential in each case for the heavy hole, light hole, and split-off band. Figures 6, 7, and 8 summarize the calibration results and compare them with experiments and other FBMC simulations from literature: Armiento83, 27 Brennan84, 28 Cook82, 29 Dunn97, 30 Fischetti91, 24 Kim92, 31 Majerfeld74, 32 Tagu-chi86, 33 Watanabe90, 34 Windhorn83, 35 and You00. 36 The electron and hole saturation velocities v sat of InAlAs are taken from Zhou et al 37 and Palankovski and Quay.…”
Section: Particlementioning
confidence: 95%