2017
DOI: 10.1002/jor.23645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact insertion of osteochondral grafts: Interference fit and central graft reduction affect biomechanics and cartilage damage

Abstract: An osteochondral graft (OCG) is an effective treatment for articular cartilage and osteochondral defects. Impact of an OCG during insertion into the osteochondral recipient site (OCR) can cause chondrocyte death and matrix damage. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effects of graft-host interference fit and a modified OCG geometry on OCG insertion biomechanics and cartilage damage. The effects of interference fit (radius of OCG - radius of OCR), loose (0.00 mm), moderate (0.05 mm), tight (0.10 mm)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One disadvantage of the suture and press-fit technologies is the risk of adversely impacting tissue health. 17 For example, press-fitting may cause chondrocyte necrosis and cartilage matrix degradation in the interface area. 10 We also examined that the continuous force generated by suturing would induce chondrocyte apoptosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One disadvantage of the suture and press-fit technologies is the risk of adversely impacting tissue health. 17 For example, press-fitting may cause chondrocyte necrosis and cartilage matrix degradation in the interface area. 10 We also examined that the continuous force generated by suturing would induce chondrocyte apoptosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, testing of isolated tissues, often performed in in vitro studies, does not represent the mechanical response of these tissues in situ, in that the response of articular cartilage in isolation is different 29,42,44 than when firmly attached to underlying subchondral bone. 52 Thus, "articulating joint" models better mimic live trauma or impact loading conditions. Furthermore, contrary to the few previously conducted closedjoint studies, 9,53 the current study attempted to induce and investigate osteochondral damage on microscale level instead of macroscopic damage or gross intra-articular fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L crack was determined as half of the total length of all crack edges visible at the articular surface. Samples were stained with India Ink (Chang et al, 1997), imaged en face by reflected light microscopy, and analyzed with NIH ImageJ software for total length of all crack edges (Su et al, 2017). L crack was taken as the average from three independent observers (intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.98).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V AC , was determined as (live cells)/(live cells+dead cells) in the central areas of the articular cartilage surface. Cartilage was isolated from bone, incubated for 24 hr in tissue culture medium including 10% FBS, stained with LIVE/DEAD® dye, imaged en face in the central 3.75×0.75 mm 2 area using fluorescence microscopy, and analyzed for live and dead cells by image processing (Borazjani et al, 2006; Pallante et al, 2009; Su et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%