2006
DOI: 10.1065/lca2006.09.275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact categories for life cycle assessment research of seafood production systems: Review and prospectus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ISO-compliant life cycle assessment methodology (8,9) was used to evaluate the cumulative energy use (MJ), biotic resource use (net primary productivity as measured in C) (23), and greenhouse gas (CO 2 -e), acidifying (SO 2 -e), and eutrophying (PO 4 -e) emissions associated with the cradleto-farm-gate production of Atlantic salmon in Norway, the UK, Chile, and British Columbia, Canada (hereafter simply Canada). The system boundaries of our analysis appear in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISO-compliant life cycle assessment methodology (8,9) was used to evaluate the cumulative energy use (MJ), biotic resource use (net primary productivity as measured in C) (23), and greenhouse gas (CO 2 -e), acidifying (SO 2 -e), and eutrophying (PO 4 -e) emissions associated with the cradleto-farm-gate production of Atlantic salmon in Norway, the UK, Chile, and British Columbia, Canada (hereafter simply Canada). The system boundaries of our analysis appear in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings have recently fueled the debate around the environmental evaluation of fishing systems (Pelletier et al 2007;Ford et al 2012;Vázquez-Rowe et al 2012a). In fact, until recent years environmental indicators in fisheries were limited to evaluating the stock of a particular species or group of species, focusing on the direct impacts of biomass removal from fisheries (Udo de Haes et al 2002;Langlois 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, until recent years environmental indicators in fisheries were limited to evaluating the stock of a particular species or group of species, focusing on the direct impacts of biomass removal from fisheries (Udo de Haes et al 2002;Langlois 2012). However, the development of a series of environmental management tools in the past few years has increased the environmental aspects that are examined in these production systems, such as climate change, ozone depletion, eco-toxicity, or eutrophication (Pelletier et al 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Impact categories commonly are global warming, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidant formation, aquatic/terrestrial ecotoxicity, human toxicity, energy use, abiotic resource use, biotic resource use, and ozone depletion [4]. Among these impact categories, global warming, eutrophication and acidification have been selected in this study since the emission of CO2, SO2, and NOx resulting from the life cycle of a fresh fish product that was examined in this study relates to them.…”
Section: Impact Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%