Impact behavior of single-layered graphene sheets based on analytical model and molecular dynamics simulation

Seifoori, Sajjad; Hajabdollahi, Hassan

doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.114

Cited by 31 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The oxidation and reduction reactions which take place at the surface of S2 and S1, respectively, are helpful for separation of the photogenerated electrons and holes. Ever since graphene (G) unlocked the eld of 2D materials because of its excellent properties, [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] other 2D materials, such as transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) [26][27][28] and phosphorene, [28][29][30] have also attracted wide attention. In particular, blue phosphorus (BlueP), a G-like material, has been a subject of investigations owing to its wide fundamental bandgap, 31 stable honeycomb structure, 32 high mobility, 33,34 and novel thermal and thermomechanical characteristics.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strain-enhanced properties of van der Waals heterostructure based on blue phosphorus and g-GaN as a visible-light-driven photocatalyst for water splitting

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strain-enhanced properties of van der Waals heterostructure based on blue phosphorus and g-GaN as a visible-light-driven photocatalyst for water splitting

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Considering the computation volume and the calculating speed, the level of convergence chooses ‘Fine’ and the maximum number of iteration steps was 10,000 steps. Before the dynamics calculation, several layers of atoms far from the interface were fixed because only a small number of atoms on the upper layer will interact with each other [ 17 ].…”

Section: Interface Simulations With and Without Sn Layermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The interfacial bonding energy is defined as the interactive bonding energy of two-layer materials, i.e.,

. The calculation of the bonding energy of two-layer materials is based on the formula from the literature [ 17 ].

…”

Section: Interface Simulations With and Without Sn Layermentioning

confidence: 99%

Interfacial Bonding Energy on the Interface between ZChSnSb/Sn Alloy Layer and Steel Body at Microscale

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To investigate the performance of bonding on the interface between ZChSnSb/Sn and steel body, the interfacial bonding energy on the interface of a ZChSnSb/Sn alloy layer and the steel body with or without Sn as an intermediate layer was calculated under the same loadcase using the molecular dynamics simulation software Materials Studio by ACCELRYS, and the interfacial bonding energy under different Babbitt thicknesses was compared. The results show that the bonding energy of the interface with Sn as an intermediate layer is 10% larger than that of the interface without a Sn layer. The interfacial bonding performances of Babbitt and the steel body with Sn as an intermediate layer are better than those of an interface without a Sn layer. When the thickness of the Babbitt layer of bushing is 17.143 Å, the interfacial bonding energy reaches the maximum, and the interfacial bonding performance is optimum. These findings illustrate the bonding mechanism of the interfacial structure from the molecular level so as to ensure the good bonding properties of the interface, which provides a reference for the improvement of the bush manufacturing process from the microscopic point of view.

show abstract

“…Chan and Hill 23 employed the mentioned method to illustrate the interaction of nanoparticles with graphene, which may be applied as a contact law in the impact problems. Seifoori and Hajabdollahi 24 and Hosseini-Hashemi et al. 25 have analyzed the impact response of single-layered graphene sheets and compared with the molecular dynamics (MD) and finite element simulations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic response of a size-dependent nanobeam to low velocity impact by a nanoparticle with considering atomic interaction forces

Noroozi

Ghadiri

Zajkani

2019

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the present paper, low velocity impact response of a size-dependent nanobeam in a thermal field with uniform temperature distribution has been investigated. The van-der Waals interaction force based on description of Lennard–Jonses is considered as the impact force between nanoparticle and nanobeam. According to third-order shear deformation beam theory, the governing equations are obtained using Hamilton's principle based on nonlocal strain-gradient theory. The Galerkin's method was adopted to solve the differential equations of nanobeam with simply supported and clamped boundary conditions. Afterward, the system of time-dependent equations by applying the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method is solved. The parametric study is presented to examine the effect of particle radius, initial velocity, temperature environment, the nonlocal parameter, and the length-scale parameter on the impact response of nanobeam.

show abstract

Impact behavior of single-layered graphene sheets based on analytical model and molecular dynamics simulation

Cited by 31 publications

References 11 publications

Strain-enhanced properties of van der Waals heterostructure based on blue phosphorus and g-GaN as a visible-light-driven photocatalyst for water splitting

Strain-enhanced properties of van der Waals heterostructure based on blue phosphorus and g-GaN as a visible-light-driven photocatalyst for water splitting

Interfacial Bonding Energy on the Interface between ZChSnSb/Sn Alloy Layer and Steel Body at Microscale

Dynamic response of a size-dependent nanobeam to low velocity impact by a nanoparticle with considering atomic interaction forces

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About