1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(96)03142-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact assessment of climate change on the hydrological response of a snow and glacier melt runoff dominated Himalayan river

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
109
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
109
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings clearly suggest that the non-uniform climatic changes on an intra-seasonal scale have distinct impact on the discharge components. Hence, uniformly perturbing various input parameters throughout the annual course (which yield physically inconsistent changes) as typically adopted in the hypothetically devised climate change scenarios [44,91] will project superficial changes in the timings of the runoff components and in the overall seasonality of the runoff regime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings clearly suggest that the non-uniform climatic changes on an intra-seasonal scale have distinct impact on the discharge components. Hence, uniformly perturbing various input parameters throughout the annual course (which yield physically inconsistent changes) as typically adopted in the hypothetically devised climate change scenarios [44,91] will project superficial changes in the timings of the runoff components and in the overall seasonality of the runoff regime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PDD models do not capture daily and seasonal runoff variability well (Hock, 1999), in part because degreeday factors can vary considerably in space and time (e.g., Hock, 1999;Singh and Kumar, 1997). Modified degree-day models that include solar radiation (e.g., Hock, 1999;Pellicciotti et al, 2005) capture daily cycles better, as well as spatial variations in melt resulting from topographic influences (i.e., effects of shading, slope, and aspect).…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Akhtar et al (2008) found that RCM data produced better results when used with a hydrological model than using poor-quality observation data; this implies greater confidence in the RCM simulated meteorology than available observational data for this region (Wiltshire, 2014). Therefore, in the literature hydrological analysis is typically at the global scale using GCMs coupled with hydrological models (Milly et al, 2005;Hirabayashi et al, 2008;Falloon et al, 2011;Wiltshire et al, 2013a, b) or at the basin scale using standalone hydrological models (Singh and Kumar, 1997;Singh and Bengtsson, 2005;Singh et al, 2008;Seidel et al, 2000) such as the soil water assessment tool (SWAT; Arnold et al, 1998). Weather data in SWAT are either simulated within the model using a weather generator or taken from observations of daily precipitation and maximum/minimum temperature (Nyeko, 2015).…”
Section: Mathison Et Al: South Asia River-flow Projections and Thmentioning
confidence: 99%