2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2020.103189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunotherapy to improve pregnancy outcome in women with abnormal natural killer cell levels/activity and recurrent miscarriage or implantation failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, this study demonstrates that prednisolone alters decidualized hESF and altered decidual-trophoblast interactions. The clinical consequences of these changes are unknown, however, as all available data suggests that corticosteroid administration has no beneficial effect for IVF (Kaye et al, 2017;Mohammadi Yeganeh et al, 2018), RPL (Tang et al, 2013;Cooper et al, 2019;Woon et al, 2020), or repeated implantation failure (Siristatidis et al, 2018) and the emerging evidence that corticosteroid use during pregnancy may be associated with poor obstetrical outcomes (Boyd et al, 2015;Bandoli et al, 2017), offlabel use of corticosteroids, in particular prednisolone, during the period of decidualization (secretory phase of the menstrual cycle and the 1st trimester), should be carefully considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, this study demonstrates that prednisolone alters decidualized hESF and altered decidual-trophoblast interactions. The clinical consequences of these changes are unknown, however, as all available data suggests that corticosteroid administration has no beneficial effect for IVF (Kaye et al, 2017;Mohammadi Yeganeh et al, 2018), RPL (Tang et al, 2013;Cooper et al, 2019;Woon et al, 2020), or repeated implantation failure (Siristatidis et al, 2018) and the emerging evidence that corticosteroid use during pregnancy may be associated with poor obstetrical outcomes (Boyd et al, 2015;Bandoli et al, 2017), offlabel use of corticosteroids, in particular prednisolone, during the period of decidualization (secretory phase of the menstrual cycle and the 1st trimester), should be carefully considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prednisolone is used an off-label therapy for RPL to reduce uterine Natural Killer (uNK) cell numbers (Dimitriadis et al, 2020). The reported efficacy of prednisolone at preventing miscarriage in women with a history of idiopathic miscarriage is highly variable between studies (Tang et al, 2013;Gomaa et al, 2014;Dan et al, 2015;Cooper et al, 2019) however, the most recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that prednisolone administration did not improve miscarriage rates or pregnancy outcome (Woon et al, 2020). Concerningly, there is emerging evidence linking corticosteroid use to preeclampsia incidence in women (Boyd et al, 2015;Bandoli et al, 2017) and dexamethasone treatment in pregnant rats induces the development of PE features (Zhang et al, 2016(Zhang et al, , 2018, however, most studies investigating the role of prednisolone in RPL are not sufficiently powered to identify rare pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the immune test positive group, IVIG treatment had a significantly higher success rate than that of immune test positive controls (57.6% vs. 21.7%, p < 0.05) 43 . A recent meta‐analysis of the non‐RCT IVIG studies focused on women with an abnormal level of NK cells showed LB in favor of the intervention (RR 2.57, 95% CI 1.79–3.69, p < 0.05) 44 . It was concluded that there might be some benefit of immunotherapy for women with NK cell pathology; however, due to the significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 62%), it is regarded as the paucity of high‐quality evidence.…”
Section: Ivig For Women With Rpl and Immune Abnormalitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Perhaps, due to this diversity, the first meta-analysis in the field, including studies assessing NK cell biology prior IVF treatment, showed no significant difference in NK cell count and activity between fertile and infertile women (Seshadri and Sunkara, 2014). Emerging evidence now put in doubt the initial notion that NK cell density and activity may predict RIF (Donoghue et al, 2019;, while a recent meta-analysis highlights that studies reporting interventions based on NK status are heterogeneous and lack the quality to produce solid evidence (Woon et al, 2020).…”
Section: Immunological Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%