1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)70132-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunotactoid (Microtubular) Glomerulopathy: An Entity Distinct From Fibrillary Glomerulonephritis?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
45
0
9

Year Published

1993
1993
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
45
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…De un lado, Alpers (14) propone considerar la glomerulopatía "inmunotactoide" como una entidad distinta de la glomerulonefritis fibrilar por su fuerte asociación a procesos linfoproliferativos y disproteinemias, a diferencia de lo que ocurre con ésta última.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…De un lado, Alpers (14) propone considerar la glomerulopatía "inmunotactoide" como una entidad distinta de la glomerulonefritis fibrilar por su fuerte asociación a procesos linfoproliferativos y disproteinemias, a diferencia de lo que ocurre con ésta última.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Aunque se han descrito numerosas asociaciones con otras enfermedades, como procesos linfoproliferativos (14,15), mieloma (6,18), síndrome de Sjögren (6), vasculitis leucocitoclástica (19) y crioglobulinemia (20), la mayoría de los casos son idiopáticos (21). A favor de la patogenia múltiple de estas entidades, merece destacarse la comunicación de recientes casos de glomerulonefritis fibrilar y glomerulopatía inmunotactoide en pacientes con infección por el virus de la hepatitis C (21,22); en uno de los cuales se informó normalización de la función renal tras completar la terapia con interferón (22).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…More recently, two distinct glomerulopathies with electron-microscopic nonamyloid fibrillary deposits were described, namely, fibrillary glomerulonephritis (FGN) and IT [5]. The distinction between FGN and IT is based on morphological differences visible on electron microscopy [5][6][7]. In IT, parallel-arranged hollow microtubular glomerular deposits with diameters ranging from 16.8 to 90.0 nm are found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proponents of subdividing ITG suggest that the diagnosis of ITG be reserved for cases with larger (Ͼ30 nM diameter), parallel microtubules ( Figure 2A) and that FGN be applied to cases with smaller (Յ30 nM diameter), randomly arranged fibrils ( Figure 2B) (9,10,13). The rationale for this subdivision is that the two morphologic categories have significantly different clinical implications (9,10,14,15).…”
Section: One Entity or Two?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale for this subdivision is that the two morphologic categories have significantly different clinical implications (9,10,14,15). In a review of the literature in 1992, Alpers (13) first proposed that such a distinction was clinically important when he found that six (54.5%) of 11 patients with microtubules that were Ͼ30 nM in diameter had associated dysproteinemia or lymphoproliferative disorder compared with only one (1.2%) of 86 patients with smaller microtubules. In 1993, Fogo et al (10), on the basis of their own experience, found that patients with organized arrays of larger microtubules were more likely to have a hematopoietic disorder than patients with small, randomly oriented fibrils.…”
Section: One Entity or Two?mentioning
confidence: 99%