2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunosenescence and immunecheckpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients: Does age really matter?

Abstract: Immunotherapy has dramatically changed the therapeutic scenario in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), extending overall survival, with a favorable safety profile. However, there is still a gap of knowledge about the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in elderly patients. Data from randomized clinical trials testing ICIs are conflicting and often lack adequate statistical power. Although two large meta-analyses suggested an absence of a significant survival benefit in patients older than 75years, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
106
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation could be represented by the higher incidence, among young patients, of very aggressive forms of cancers (such as renal carcinoma with Xp11.2 translocation). Our result of a statistically significant benefit in OS for patients with non-EO of cancer compared with whom with EO of cancer meets halfway the opposite evidences of immunosenescence and residual immunocompetence in elderly patients [42,43]. The statistically significant correlation between sex and median OS at multivariate analysis, in favor of female patients, remains partly unexplained, and needs further confirmations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A possible explanation could be represented by the higher incidence, among young patients, of very aggressive forms of cancers (such as renal carcinoma with Xp11.2 translocation). Our result of a statistically significant benefit in OS for patients with non-EO of cancer compared with whom with EO of cancer meets halfway the opposite evidences of immunosenescence and residual immunocompetence in elderly patients [42,43]. The statistically significant correlation between sex and median OS at multivariate analysis, in favor of female patients, remains partly unexplained, and needs further confirmations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Whether the efficacy and toxicity profile of ICIs in older patients differs from that in younger patients remains unclear . Concerns have been raised about diminished efficacy of immunotherapy in the older patient population, perhaps secondary to immunosenescence, involving a complex physiologic interplay between both the aging innate and adaptive immune systems . In addition, it is unclear if the efficacy and toxicity profile of ICIs differs by PS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Concerns have been raised about diminished efficacy of immunotherapy in the older patient population, perhaps secondary to immunosenescence, involving a complex physiologic interplay between both the aging innate and adaptive immune systems. [18][19][20][21] In addition, it is unclear if the efficacy and toxicity profile of ICIs differs by PS. To address these knowledge gaps, we conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of ICIs in older patients with advanced NSCLC seen in routine clinical practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it remains an unresolved question whether efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in older patients is affected by a still poorly characterized phenomenon referred to as immunosenescence, i.e., the global and progressive remodeling of immune functions with aging [14,15,18,19]. Age-related alterations such as impaired T-cell activation, reduced T-cell receptor diversity, altered antigen-uptake and -presenting functions, or the increased generation of immune suppressive cells may impair the antitumor response and thus could be one of the reasons for a higher incidence and prevalence of most cancers in older people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%