2019
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Real‐World Treatment of Older Adults with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract: OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in older patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) seen in routine clinical practice. DESIGN Retrospective study. SETTING Single academic institution and its affiliated centers. PARTICIPANTS Patients 70 years or older with advanced‐stage NSCLC seen between April 1, 2015, and April 1, 2017, and treated with ICIs. MEASUREMENTS Efficacy data included overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF), str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
66
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(112 reference statements)
8
66
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…What other real-world evidence do we have to guide therapy for older individuals with mNSCLC?In a recent study by Muchnik et al in patients aged >70 years who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, the ECOG PS, rather than chronological age or comorbidities, largely drove outcomes. 7 The population was similar to that of the SEER analysis reported by Youn et al 2 in this issue of Cancer in that the majority of the patients received nivolumab (87%) and received therapy in the second-line setting (69%). Similar to the SEER analysis, results from the study by Muchnik et al 7 demonstrated that older patients in general derived similar benefits from immune checkpoint inhibitors.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…What other real-world evidence do we have to guide therapy for older individuals with mNSCLC?In a recent study by Muchnik et al in patients aged >70 years who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, the ECOG PS, rather than chronological age or comorbidities, largely drove outcomes. 7 The population was similar to that of the SEER analysis reported by Youn et al 2 in this issue of Cancer in that the majority of the patients received nivolumab (87%) and received therapy in the second-line setting (69%). Similar to the SEER analysis, results from the study by Muchnik et al 7 demonstrated that older patients in general derived similar benefits from immune checkpoint inhibitors.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…Conversely, among approximately one-half of the patients (49%) with an ECOG PS of ≥2, the median survival was a mere 3.8 months compared with 13.7 months in patients with an ECOG PS of 0 to 1. 7 The study by Youn et al 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Muchnik et al evaluated 75 patients who were 70 years or older with advanced-stage NSCLC treated with an ICI between 2015 and 2017 [17]. Of these, 49% had ECOG PS ≥2 disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various clinical parameters have been considered to potentially predict CPI toxicity. Age in NSCLC does not appear to predict for increased risk of toxicity; however, older patients were more likely to require intervention to manage irAEs . A study investigating the impact of body composition parameters on ipilimumab toxicity found sarcopenia and low muscle attenuation to be significantly associated with high‐grade adverse events on multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR) = 5·34 and 5·23, respectively] .…”
Section: Prediction Of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor‐related Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%