1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7306(08)60483-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunological methods in plant hormone research

Michael H. Beale
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several analytical techniques have been used in plant hormone analysis ( ). While methods based on ultraviolet or electron capture detectors are almost abandoned, indirect methods such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays are still used frequently ( , ). Recently, determination of ABA by capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection has been achieved ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several analytical techniques have been used in plant hormone analysis ( ). While methods based on ultraviolet or electron capture detectors are almost abandoned, indirect methods such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays are still used frequently ( , ). Recently, determination of ABA by capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection has been achieved ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of sensitive and specific methods have been developed for quantification of individual plant hormones. These include GC–MS, high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry (LC–MS) (see Crozier and Moritz, 1999), as well as indirect methods such as enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (see Beale, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the usage in a practical milk-progesterone assay kit the antibodies which do not react with other sex hormones had to be prepared. Because the hapten was linked to BSA at position 11α, higher cross-reactivity with steroid structures modified on carbon 11 and 19 localized in the area of coupling was predictable (Erlanger et al, 1957;Beale, 1999); however, these steroids should not interfere with progesterone in milk.…”
Section: Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%