Immunological Methods for Detection and Identification of Infectious Disease and Biological Warfare Agents

Abstract

NATURE OF THE PROBLEMBW agents. The release of a biological weapon (BW) agent by a terrorist group or military force would likely be silent and undetectable or nearly so. As shown by anthrax attack during the fall of 2001 in the eastern United States, patients would begin appearing at hospitals and clinics within several days of exposure, most presenting with nonspecific flu-like symptoms. The first days of the outbreak might not even cause undue concern. However, depending on the type of agent and the method of dispersal, the public healthcare system would rapidly be stretched to capacity and beyond.The qualities that make a good BW agent are its relationship between aerosolization, infectivity, or toxicity and the amount of agent required to produce an effect (48). In addition, criteria such as environmental stability, ease of production, disease severity, and communicability determine which agents are the most likely to be utilized. For maximum effect, an optimal agent should be highly lethal and easily produced in large quantities and have limited options for preventive or prophylactic treatment. Given that the respiratory route is the most effective for most BW agents, stability in an aerosol form and the capability to be readily dispersed also in an aerosol (1-to 10-m particle size) are necessary. When potential agents are reviewed for these characteristics, Bacillus anthracis (anthrax) and variola major virus (smallpox) are considered to have the greatest potential for mass casualties and civil disruption. Also high on a prospective list of agents are botulinum neurotoxins, Yersinia pestis, and Francisella tularensis (48,91,92). Lower on the prospective list are Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei, Rickettsia sp., Coxiella burnetii, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, Marburg and Ebola viruses, and influenza viruses (48,63,91,92).Emerging infectious disease agents. In addition to diseases caused by intentional epidemics, there are several emerging infectious diseases (ID) with the potential for significant public health consequences, including dengue fever, West Nile fever, and Rift Valley fever as well as the recent reemergence of malaria in the eastern United States (48,63,91,92). As with BW agents, emerging ID agents may be directly transmissible or vector borne (63). A complex interplay of factors can influence disease emergence, including genetic variation, environmental changes, and population pressures. Further compounding this already complicated situation, are the estimated 600 million international tourists annually, many with the potential to the spread disease globally in a matter of hours (63). Clearly, the challenges facing modern clinical microbiologists and immunologists are daunting enough without the added difficulties posed by the intentional release of BW/ID agents! Because of the threat posed by both BW and emerging or reemerging ID agents, there is a need to rapidly identify such agents in the clinical setting in order to treat the individuals at risk and to improve p...

Designing novel nano-immunoassays: antibody orientation versus sensitivity

“…Traditionally, lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) tests are basically designed for colorimetric detection by visual inspection. Hereby, detection antibodies are usually labelled by coupling to colloidal gold, coloured latex microparticles, carbon, etc [2][3]. The test is considered positive when the amount of analyte is large enough so that the labelling colloidal particles can be detected by eye view (Scheme 1).…”

Biological Warfare Agents and their Detection and Monitoring Techniques (Review Paper)

“…HHIAs generally provide a presumptive identification of unknown sample. Sensitivity and specificity of these assays is comparably lesser than the other immunological methods 28 . Another disadvantage of the HHIAs is that in presence of large excess of the analyte, these assays may exhibit false negative results due to 'hook effect'.…”

Diagnostic Bioterrorism Response Strategies

“…A problem with conventional detection methods are the lack of positive controls since these methods are based on living organisms. Rapid detection methods have been well investigated (Canton, 2005) (Peruski et al, 2003). The most useful technology for identification of biothreat agents is real-time PCR.…”