2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2012.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunological characterization of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae recombinant proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the antigenicity of M. hyopneumoniae proteins expressed in E. coli, Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed as previously described (18). For the Western blot analysis, two pools containing five convalescent-phase pig sera and one pool with five SPF pig sera were tested.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To assess the antigenicity of M. hyopneumoniae proteins expressed in E. coli, Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed as previously described (18). For the Western blot analysis, two pools containing five convalescent-phase pig sera and one pool with five SPF pig sera were tested.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recombinant plasmids were transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3)-RIL expression-competent cells. Recombinant protein expression and solubility testing were performed as previously described (16,18). The purity of the purified recombinant proteins was analyzed on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel, and the protein concentrations were determined using the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's instructions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…M. hyopneumoniae culture is laborious, time-consuming, and requires several weeks to produce results; frequently, the culture media can become overgrown with M. hyorhinis or M. flocculare as well (DorigoZetsma et al, 1999). Serological methods are insufficiently sensitive and cannot distinguish between vaccinated and M. hyopneumoniae-infected pigs in field screening (Moitinho-Silva et al, 2012;Simionatto et al, 2012). More rapid, higher sensitivity methods were therefore developed, one of them being the PCR technique for M. hyopneumoniae DNA detection (Dorigo-Zetsma et al, 1999;Lu et al, 2010;Shen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%