2017
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2017/373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunohistochemical Profile of Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma Breast- Prognostic and Therapeutic Use

Abstract: BACKGROUND Breast carcinoma is the most common malignant tumour and the leading cause of death in women. Various prognostic and predictive factors are used in the management of breast cancer. Oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) & human epidermal growth receptor (HER2/neu) are prognostic as well as predictive factors. The aim of the present study was conducted to evaluate ER, PR & HER2/neu expression in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast (not otherwise specified) by immunohistochemistry to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grade II was the commonest grade amongst the 50 cases (17.5%), and 17.5 % the tumor size was between 2-4 cm. Similar was the observation was Premchand, Ashok Kumar et al 5 who studied 100 cases and majority (96.82%) of the breast carcinoma was in the age group of >40 years. 43% cases were of grade II tumor and, in 47% cases the tumor size was between 2-5 c.m.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Grade II was the commonest grade amongst the 50 cases (17.5%), and 17.5 % the tumor size was between 2-4 cm. Similar was the observation was Premchand, Ashok Kumar et al 5 who studied 100 cases and majority (96.82%) of the breast carcinoma was in the age group of >40 years. 43% cases were of grade II tumor and, in 47% cases the tumor size was between 2-5 c.m.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…8 Correlation of age of the patient with ER and PR status with other studies done. In our study 10% cases were of 60 years of age group and 8.5% are of >40 years of age group were ER positive, while 8% in age group of >40 were Premchand, Ashok Kumar et al 5 shows similar result like our study which has majority of ER positive (96.82%) cases were of age >40 year and 44.44% were of age >60 years. The majority of PR positive (96.55%) cases were of age >40 years and 43.10% were of age >60 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations