2012
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2011.055459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunohistochemical markers for tumor associated macrophages and survival in advanced classical Hodgkin's lymphoma

Abstract: A subset of patients with advanced classical Hodgkin's lymphoma is refractory to standard therapies. Therefore, it is relevant to identify new biologically-based prognostic markers. Recently, tumor associated macrophages have been proposed as a factor that predicts survival, although contradictory results have also been reported. Here we analyzed four macrophage markers (CD68, CD163, LYZ, and STAT1) using immunohistochemistry and automated quantification, in two independent series of advanced classical Hodgkin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CD163, more specific than CD68 marker, is expressed in the M2 macrophages. Several studies had already proved that high M2 macrophage count indicated tumor more aggressive and poor prognosis, including breast cancer (Shabo et al, 2008), lung adenocarcinoma (Zhang et al, 2011), and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (Sanchez-Espiridion et al, 2012). Moreover, Lan et al recently showed that the infiltration of CD163-positive M2 macrophages as well as activation of macrophages towards the M2 phenotype may contribute to poor survival in advanced ovarian cancer (Lan et al, 2013), which was consistent with our results that demonstrated that both high M2 macrophage count in primary tumor and percent in ascites were closely related to EOC patients with advanced stage and platinum resistant and refractory and suggested a shorter OS and PFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD163, more specific than CD68 marker, is expressed in the M2 macrophages. Several studies had already proved that high M2 macrophage count indicated tumor more aggressive and poor prognosis, including breast cancer (Shabo et al, 2008), lung adenocarcinoma (Zhang et al, 2011), and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (Sanchez-Espiridion et al, 2012). Moreover, Lan et al recently showed that the infiltration of CD163-positive M2 macrophages as well as activation of macrophages towards the M2 phenotype may contribute to poor survival in advanced ovarian cancer (Lan et al, 2013), which was consistent with our results that demonstrated that both high M2 macrophage count in primary tumor and percent in ascites were closely related to EOC patients with advanced stage and platinum resistant and refractory and suggested a shorter OS and PFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD163 positivity was scored by 2 independent hematopathologists (C. Keane and L.A. Seymour) using a standardized protocol and the mean value recorded. Samples were delineated as high or low based on a previously published cutoff of 25% (16)(17)(18). In addition, dual staining of CD163 and CD68 (mouse antihuman CD68 clone: PG-M, 40 mg/mL, DAKO) was done on 12 samples to confirm CD163 specificity.…”
Section: Tissue Mrna Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD163 is an M2 macrophage marker that is also expressed in a subset of monocytes, and is highly expressed within tumor-infiltrating cells of the malignant node. Tissue levels of CD163 within the cHL node may be associated with survival, but results are conflicting (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). A study of serum CD163 (sCD163) in patients with stage I/ II melanoma found that pretherapy sCD163 was an independent predictor of survival (19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different cut-off points were used and accordingly the results are different. While, most studies reported association between high CD68+ TAM infiltration and poor survival outcomes (DFS, [5,19,[35][36][37][38]41] DSS, [13,19,36] or OS), [5,[35][36][37][41][42][43][44][45] fewer studies found that there no relation between high levels of CD68+ TAM infiltration and outcome. [16,26,39,40] The results from our study support the trend that higher CD68+ TAM infiltration in TAM can be used as a biological marker for stratification of patients with risk of adverse outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The presence of numerous tumour associated macrophages (TAM) in HL correlated with B symptoms and a poor response to therapy. [10][11][12][13][14] Also, TAM had been associated with disease status in non-haematological malignancies. [15][16][17] A gene signature of TAM associated with primary treatment failure in cHL and immunohistochemical detection of TAM was correlated with a shorter disease free survival (DFS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%