2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2022.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunogenicity assessment of AAV-based gene therapies: An IQ consortium industry white paper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 197 publications
(367 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The introduction of various standardized quality measures for a catheter-based clinically applicable ROA and a meaningful clinical endpoint design by our CMR study enabled a first proof-of-concept study already demonstrating therapeutic efficacy of the vector-target system with a dosage ranging at the lower end of approved dose margins in current early rAAV-based CHF gene therapy trials. This corroborates the therapeutic efficacy of our GTMP candidate rAAV5 -hS100A1 and provides the rationale for further pre-clinical dose-escalating studies leveraging the full dose range of up to 3×10 14 vgcs per patient being approved for AAV-based CHF GTMPs in ongoing FiH studies (NCT04179643). The favorable clinical safety profile of rAAV5, its high production yield and experience of regulatory bodies with this serotype, render the vector a promising candidate for expedited cardiac GTMP developmental programs using S100A1 as a therapeutic target.…”
Section: Conclusion and Clinical Perspectivesupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The introduction of various standardized quality measures for a catheter-based clinically applicable ROA and a meaningful clinical endpoint design by our CMR study enabled a first proof-of-concept study already demonstrating therapeutic efficacy of the vector-target system with a dosage ranging at the lower end of approved dose margins in current early rAAV-based CHF gene therapy trials. This corroborates the therapeutic efficacy of our GTMP candidate rAAV5 -hS100A1 and provides the rationale for further pre-clinical dose-escalating studies leveraging the full dose range of up to 3×10 14 vgcs per patient being approved for AAV-based CHF GTMPs in ongoing FiH studies (NCT04179643). The favorable clinical safety profile of rAAV5, its high production yield and experience of regulatory bodies with this serotype, render the vector a promising candidate for expedited cardiac GTMP developmental programs using S100A1 as a therapeutic target.…”
Section: Conclusion and Clinical Perspectivesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Hence, conclusions drawn from these clinical programs should advice the selection of appropriate AAV vector types for cardiac GTMP programs to mitigate the risk of failure throughout pre-clinical and clinical development. [12][13][14] Of note, rAAV9, which engendered considerable interest as a vector for treating hereditary and common cardiac disorders 1,3 , provoked numerous serious (SAEs) and fatal adverse events (FAEs) in clinical studies for spinal muscular atrophy or Duchenne muscular dystrophy (rAAV9-miniDMD) 15,16 . To this rAAV5 contrasts with proven long-term clinical safety and efficacy in patients, such as for hemophilia A or B.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible interpretation of this might be related to repeated exposure to the living environment and latent AAVs, integrated into the chromosome and re-activated with the infection of helper virus, including adenovirus. 14,33 Indeed, our data suggest that the second challenge with AAV induced high titer of NAbs which cross-reacted with many AAV serotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…[9][10][11] Hence, most clinical trials of systemic administration of AAV vector have targeted only patients without NAbs against the AAV. [12][13][14] We have recently reported the prevalence of NAbs against several AAV serotypes in Japanese hemophiliacs and healthy individuals and found the prevalence to range from 20% to 30% in the parent population. 15 The administration of AAV vectors, in addition to natural infection with AAV, correspondingly induces a high titer of NAbs against the AAV vector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, reducing the vector dose is one important aspect of ensuring the safety of AAV-based gene therapy. [11][12][13] Another problem with AAV vectors is the patient's immune status against AAV. Like the naturally occurring anti-AAV-neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) attenuates AAV-mediated gene therapy, 14,15 induction of NAbs after an AAV vector administration deprives a chance to re-administrate the same serotype of the AAV vector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%