Abstract:Linkage of cadherins to the cytoskeleton is crucial for their adhesive function. Since alpha- and beta-catenin play a key role in this linkage, these proteins are possible targets for processes that control cell-cell adhesion. To achieve a better understanding of the regulation of cell-cell adhesion in embryonic morphogenesis, we used immunohistology to investigate how in Xenopus blastomeres catenins respond to disturbances in the expression of maternal cadherins. Overexpression of myc-tagged maternal cadherin… Show more
“…S2A-A0). Classic cadherins bind to b-catenin, and as expected (Schneider et al, 1993;Fagotto and Gumbiner, 1994;Kurth et al, 1999), membrane b-catenin paralleled C-cadherin expression (supplementary material Fig. S2E-G0), indicating that other cadherins do not compensate for changes in C-cadherin levels.…”
SummaryAdhesion differences between cell populations are in principle a source of strong morphogenetic forces promoting cell sorting, boundary formation and tissue positioning, and cadherins are main mediators of cell adhesion. However, a direct link between cadherin expression, differential adhesion and morphogenesis has not yet been determined for a specific process in vivo. To identify such a connection, we modulated the expression of C-cadherin in the Xenopus laevis gastrula, and combined this with direct measurements of cell adhesion-related parameters. Our results show that gastrulation is surprisingly tolerant of overall changes in adhesion. Also, as expected, experimentally generated, cadherin-based adhesion differences promote cell sorting in vitro. Importantly, however, such differences do not lead to the sorting of cells in the embryo, showing that differential adhesion is not sufficient to drive morphogenesis in this system. Compensatory recruitment of cadherin protein to contacts between cadherin-deprived and -overexpressing cells could contribute to the prevention of sorting in vivo.
“…S2A-A0). Classic cadherins bind to b-catenin, and as expected (Schneider et al, 1993;Fagotto and Gumbiner, 1994;Kurth et al, 1999), membrane b-catenin paralleled C-cadherin expression (supplementary material Fig. S2E-G0), indicating that other cadherins do not compensate for changes in C-cadherin levels.…”
SummaryAdhesion differences between cell populations are in principle a source of strong morphogenetic forces promoting cell sorting, boundary formation and tissue positioning, and cadherins are main mediators of cell adhesion. However, a direct link between cadherin expression, differential adhesion and morphogenesis has not yet been determined for a specific process in vivo. To identify such a connection, we modulated the expression of C-cadherin in the Xenopus laevis gastrula, and combined this with direct measurements of cell adhesion-related parameters. Our results show that gastrulation is surprisingly tolerant of overall changes in adhesion. Also, as expected, experimentally generated, cadherin-based adhesion differences promote cell sorting in vitro. Importantly, however, such differences do not lead to the sorting of cells in the embryo, showing that differential adhesion is not sufficient to drive morphogenesis in this system. Compensatory recruitment of cadherin protein to contacts between cadherin-deprived and -overexpressing cells could contribute to the prevention of sorting in vivo.
“…The pCS2‐Oct‐3/4 was constructed by cloning the full‐length Oct‐3/4 cDNA into the ClaI site of pCS2. The other expression plasmids were pEVRF‐Oct‐3/4, Oct‐3/4‐ΔN, Oct‐3/4‐ΔC (Ben‐Shushan et al , 1998); pOct1 (Tanaka and Herr, 1990); pOct‐2 (Clerc et al , 1988); pOct‐6 (Meijer et al , 1992); Flag‐β‐catenin, Flag‐DP, Flag‐D32N, Flag‐S33, Flag‐Axin1, Myc‐Axin1 and GFP (Amit et al , 2002); pCS2‐xWnt‐8 (Kelly et al , 1995); pCS2‐xSiamois (Lemaire et al , 1995); pCS2‐x β‐catenin (Kurth et al , 1999) and TOP‐Flash and FOP‐Flash (Korinek et al , 1997). The pLKO.1 lentivral vector‐expressing shRNA against β‐catenin was bought from Openbiosystems (Cat RMM4534).…”
Although the transcriptional regulatory events triggered by Oct-3/4 are well documented, understanding the proteomic networks that mediate the diverse functions of this POU domain homeobox protein remains a major challenge. Here, we present genetic and biochemical studies that suggest an unexpected novel strategy for Oct-3/4-dependent regulation of embryogenesis and cell lineage determination. Our data suggest that Oct-3/4 specifically interacts with nuclear b-catenin and facilitates its proteasomal degradation, resulting in the maintenance of an undifferentiated, early embryonic phenotype both in Xenopus embryos and embryonic stem (ES) cells. Our data also show that Oct-3/4-mediated control of b-catenin stability has an important function in regulating ES cell motility. Down-regulation of Oct-3/4 increases b-catenin protein levels, enhancing Wnt signalling and initiating invasive cellular activity characteristic of epithelialmesenchymal transition. Our data suggest a novel mode of regulation by which a delicate balance between b-catenin, Tcf3 and Oct-3/4 regulates maintenance of stem cell identity. Altering the balance between these proteins can direct cell fate decisions and differentiation.
“…Double immunofluorescent whole-mount labelling of embryos was performed as described previously (Kurth et al, 1999;Kurth, 2003) using the following primary antibodies: P14L (polyclonal rabbit antibody against b-catenin; Schneider et al, 1993;, and a mouse monoclonal antinucleoplasmin antibody (b7-1A9, Wedlich et al, 1985). As secondary antibodies Cy3-coupled goat-anti-rabbit IgGs (Dianova) and Alexa 488-coupled goat-anti-mouse IgGs (Molecular Probes) were applied.…”
Section: Histology and Double Fluorescence Immunostainingmentioning
During development cell proliferation and morphogenetic movements are tightly intermingled. Both processes depend on the same cytoskeletal elements. Therefore, precise regulation of local mitotic activity seems to be basic for proper embryogenesis. Here, I report on bottle cells as an early non-mitotic cell population in the Xenopus gastrula. Endogenous and activin/BVg1-induced ectopic bottle cells do not proliferate. Overexpression of the mitosis-promoting phosphatase cdc25C increases the proliferation rate and interferes with bottle cell formation whereas the phosphatase-dead mutant cdc25C(C457A) does not. Cdc25C also affects other gastrulation processes such as epiboly, vegetal rotation or tissue separation as inferred from histological inspection of early gastrulae. Double stainings of gsc/Xbra transcripts and mitotic nuclei in ectopic and endogenous lips demonstrated that non-mitotic cells occur in the bottle cell region and, to a lesser extent, in the gsc domain which both are indicative of high TGF-beta signalling. In contrast, the Xbra-region and the remainder of the animal cap appear to be permissive for higher rates of cell proliferation. These data suggest inhibition of cell proliferation by high levels of activin-type signals and a close link of mesodermal and mitotic patterning. Finally, coexpression of eFGF together with activin/BVg1 interferes with TGF-beta-induced bottle cell formation. This inhibitory effect correlates with increased cell proliferation as compared to embryos injected with activin/BVg1 alone. Taken together, these data suggest that TGF-beta and FGF signals play antagonistic roles in bottle cell formation and the spatial control of the cell cycle in early Xenopus gastrulae.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.