2012
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.095315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cadherin-dependent differential cell adhesion in Xenopus causes cell sorting in vitro, but not in the embryo

Abstract: SummaryAdhesion differences between cell populations are in principle a source of strong morphogenetic forces promoting cell sorting, boundary formation and tissue positioning, and cadherins are main mediators of cell adhesion. However, a direct link between cadherin expression, differential adhesion and morphogenesis has not yet been determined for a specific process in vivo. To identify such a connection, we modulated the expression of C-cadherin in the Xenopus laevis gastrula, and combined this with direct … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(55 reference statements)
6
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of manipulating cadherin levels and functions in normal embryonic tissues has been studied in the Xenopus gastrula, and the results did not support DAH: interference with cadherin adhesion did not affect normal tissue separation, while the artificial creation of adhesive differences failed to induce separation (Ninomiya et al, 2012). Sorting at the notochord boundary was found to be astonishingly resistant to the manipulation of cell adhesion (Reintsch et al, 2005;Fagotto et al, 2013).…”
Section: Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of manipulating cadherin levels and functions in normal embryonic tissues has been studied in the Xenopus gastrula, and the results did not support DAH: interference with cadherin adhesion did not affect normal tissue separation, while the artificial creation of adhesive differences failed to induce separation (Ninomiya et al, 2012). Sorting at the notochord boundary was found to be astonishingly resistant to the manipulation of cell adhesion (Reintsch et al, 2005;Fagotto et al, 2013).…”
Section: Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reconstitution of the separation process in mixed aggregates remains a simple and powerful assay with which to study the underlying mechanisms (e.g. Chen et al, 2009;Ninomiya et al, 2012). It is however crucial to remember that mere sorting into distinct clusters cannot be equated to separation (Fig.…”
Section: Relationship Between Cell Sorting and Boundary Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recent efforts, however, have challenged this notion. Indeed, in some cases, the differential expression of cadherins does not lead to cell sorting in vivo or in embryoid bodies (Moore et al, 2009(Moore et al, , 2014Ninomiya et al, 2012). Taking into account that cells undergo active processes such as polarization, the in vivo and in vitro results can be reconciled.…”
Section: The Role Of Adhesive Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Xenopus, as in most early embryos, the most commonly used assay for detecting the expression of a gene is whole mount in situ hybridization using labeled antisense RNA probes. The use of antibody staining to assess expression of a gene in Xenopus is becoming more common as researchers discover antibodies, usually raised against mammalian proteins, that cross react to the Xenopus homologue or generate their own [1][2][3] . However, the vast majority of studies on Xenopus organogenesis still utilize antisense RNA probes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%