2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunochromatographic test for detection of adenovirus from respiratory samples: Is it a real solution for pediatric emergency department?

Abstract: Rapid diagnosis of adenoviral respiratory infections is required in order to decide optimal treatment strategies. The adenovirus antigen immunochromatography Adeno Respiratory Card Letitest (Leti diagnostics, Barcelona, Spain), was evaluated versus the shell-vial culture and multiplex PCR (Clart Pneumovir Version 3.0, Genomica, Madrid, Spain), in nasopharyngeal washes and oropharyngeal swabs specimens from subjects with respiratory tract infections. Between April 2011 and November 2012, 224 patients were inclu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antigen detection tests for ADV based on immunochromatography have shown variable analytical results. Romero-Gómez et al (2014) reported moderate sensitivity (80%) and low specificity (60.9%) compared to viral culture and lower sensitivity compared to NAATs (77.9%), whereas Fujimoto et al (2004) found 100% specificity and sensitivities of 95% and 91% compared with viral culture and NAATs, respectively. In our study, mariPOC yielded a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 98.5% for ADV detection compared with NAATs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Antigen detection tests for ADV based on immunochromatography have shown variable analytical results. Romero-Gómez et al (2014) reported moderate sensitivity (80%) and low specificity (60.9%) compared to viral culture and lower sensitivity compared to NAATs (77.9%), whereas Fujimoto et al (2004) found 100% specificity and sensitivities of 95% and 91% compared with viral culture and NAATs, respectively. In our study, mariPOC yielded a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 98.5% for ADV detection compared with NAATs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, sensitivity may vary depending on the method and/ or type of patient and sample (CDC, 2009;Lieberman et al, 2009;Utokaparch et al, 2011). These assays have also been used for the detection of other respiratory viruses, as hMPV (Matsuzaki et al, 2009) and ADV (Fujimoto et al, 2004;Romero-Gómez et al, 2014), with variable sensitivities. Thus, the routine investigation of these latter viruses by RDTs has not been considered a cost-effective point-of-care approach, since it leads to a significant increase in costs and a more cumbersome processing of respiratory samples in emergency settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IC kits for adenoviruses have also been used for detecting adenoviruses using nasopharyngeal washes and oropharyngeal swabs from patients with suspected lower respiratory tract infections (LRIs). In this setting, the sensitivity and specificity were 77.9% and 73.6%, respectively, using multiplex PCR as the reference standard 15. This low sensitivity and specificity may be attributable to the difficulty of applying IC kits for adenoviruses to LRIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…HAdVs pneumonia typically is limited to children, immunocompromised hosts, and usually a cluster erupts [4], but with the development of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology, HAdVs pneumonia has been increasingly found to be involved in sporadic cases and outbreaks of SCAP in adults. Though it is generally self-limited, once it has progressed to severe pneumonia, the fatality rate is extremely high [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%