1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1993.tb00539.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunization status and demographic characteristics of New Zealand infants in the first 6 months of life

Abstract: In the Royal New Zealand Plunket Society's 1990-91 cohort study, of 3902 children, 985 (25.2%) had fallen behind the immunization schedule by 6 months of age. These children were more likely to be from lower socio-economic groups or to have mothers who were older, with high or low education, or of higher parity. The infants were also more likely to be from non-European families, or to have unemployed fathers. Eight hundred and ten (82.2%) of the incompletely immunized children at that age could be brought up-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coverage for NIP vaccines ranged between 87.9% and 100.0%, while the coverage for non-NIP vaccines ranged between 0% between 74.8%. Our observation agreed with previous reports from U.S. 13 The maternal determinants identified in our study for immunization coverage of non-NIP vaccines, such as lower education level, mother with a job, mother' s poor awareness of vaccination, were in agreement with the findings of previous studies [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . There were some reasons for that: first, education level may influence mother's knowledge of and attitude and behavior to take advantage of vaccination service for her child; second, mothers with jobs may not have enough time to spare for the primary healthcare including immunization, and may be less aware of the information on immunization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…The coverage for NIP vaccines ranged between 87.9% and 100.0%, while the coverage for non-NIP vaccines ranged between 0% between 74.8%. Our observation agreed with previous reports from U.S. 13 The maternal determinants identified in our study for immunization coverage of non-NIP vaccines, such as lower education level, mother with a job, mother' s poor awareness of vaccination, were in agreement with the findings of previous studies [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . There were some reasons for that: first, education level may influence mother's knowledge of and attitude and behavior to take advantage of vaccination service for her child; second, mothers with jobs may not have enough time to spare for the primary healthcare including immunization, and may be less aware of the information on immunization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…This study confirmed findings from a number of survey-based studies: children from larger families, 4,30,31 those with single parents, 3,32 younger mothers 5 or mothers who were bor n overseas 5 were less likely to be fully immunised. Other f actors related to incomplete immunisation that had not previously been reported include home birth, lack of pri vate health insurance and relatively shor t interval between pregnancies (12-23 months).…”
Section: Predictors Of Incomplete Immunisationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Other risk factors in our study, such as not being the firstborn child and lower educational level of the caregiver, were also found to be associated with incomplete immunization in a study by Bobo et al (19). These same factors were associated with undervaccination among children by the age of 6 months in New Zealand (20). Although unemployment of the caregiver was found to be a risk factor associated with undervaccination in a similar study conducted in Italy (21), it was not associated with undervaccination in our study or in a study in Flanders, Belgium (22).…”
Section: Factors Associated With Incomplete Coveragesupporting
confidence: 63%