1951
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1951.02040030529005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IMMUNIZATION IN THE YOUNG INFANT<subtitle>Response to Combined Vaccines: VI-X</subtitle>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1952
1952
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been conflicting reports as to whether or not passive transport of maternal tetanus or diphtheria antibody interferes with the infants' response to immunization with the respective antigen (23)(24)(25)(26). We found no correlation between maternal or newborn preterm infant tetanus and diphtheria IgG antibody levels, and the antibody levels to these antigens at 9 months of age.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…There have been conflicting reports as to whether or not passive transport of maternal tetanus or diphtheria antibody interferes with the infants' response to immunization with the respective antigen (23)(24)(25)(26). We found no correlation between maternal or newborn preterm infant tetanus and diphtheria IgG antibody levels, and the antibody levels to these antigens at 9 months of age.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…In contrast to rigorous responses to locally acting antigens, parenteral immunisation of young infants and young primates has resulted in low or even absent antibody responses. For example, pertussis vaccine often fails to immunise infants during the first 3 months of life [9]. Injection of BSA into newborn Rhesus monkeys resulted in tolerance [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%