1991
DOI: 10.1016/0882-4010(91)90075-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunity conferred by Aro− salmonella live vaccines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
1
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Matulova et al (48) showed that S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis live vaccines with SPI-1 mutations can protect chickens against challenge with either serovar. However, our results are congruent with those of Hormaeche et al (49), who showed that the S. Typhimurium aroA vaccine SL3261 conferred protection against 10,000 LD 50 of S. Typhimurium but no protection against S. Enteritidis. Taken together, the crossprotection data suggest that live attenuated S. Typhimurium vaccines can protect against challenge with S. Typhimurium but that protection against other serovars is variable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…More recently, Matulova et al (48) showed that S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis live vaccines with SPI-1 mutations can protect chickens against challenge with either serovar. However, our results are congruent with those of Hormaeche et al (49), who showed that the S. Typhimurium aroA vaccine SL3261 conferred protection against 10,000 LD 50 of S. Typhimurium but no protection against S. Enteritidis. Taken together, the crossprotection data suggest that live attenuated S. Typhimurium vaccines can protect against challenge with S. Typhimurium but that protection against other serovars is variable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In C57BL/6 mice, the efficacious immune response against attenuated S. typhimurium strains gives rise to protection against subsequent oral challenge with doses of wild-type S. typhimurium that are fatal for nonvaccinated animals (16 ( Table I). Vaccination with the aroA Ϫ strain induced protection in Ig ϩ/ϩ mice and some of these mice survived even challenge infection with 2 ϫ 10 9 virulent bacteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the degree of bacterial attenuation, Nramp1 s mice control infection and are protected against reinfection with wild-type S. typhimurium (15)(16)(17)(18). Experiments with gene-deficient mice demonstrated that control of primary infection with an attenuated S. typhimurium strain (aroA Ϫ ) strictly depends on CD4 ϩ T lymphocytes (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a murine model, anti-lipid A monoclonal [7] or anti-idiotype antibodies [13] protected mice against a lethal challenge with rough LPS. However, it was demonstrated that by using direct passive transfer of anti-LPS antibodies [20,21,28,29,37], LPS alone cannot fully account for the specificity of protection by antibodies. The specificity of cross-protection was previously studied [19], using Typhimurium, Enteritidis and Dublin for vaccination and challenge, with variants that differed in the main LPS antigen (0-4 or 0-9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%