2021
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune checkpoint blocking impact and nomogram prediction of COVID-19 inactivated vaccine seroconversion in patients with cancer: a propensity-score matched analysis

Abstract: BackgroundPatients with cancer on active immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy were recommended to seek prophylaxis from COVID-19 by vaccination. There have been few reports to date to discuss the impact of progression cell death-1 blockers (PD-1B) on immune or vaccine-related outcomes, and what risk factors that contribute to the serological status remains to be elucidated. The study aims to find the impact of PD-1B on vaccination outcome and investigate other potential risk factors associated with the risk of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 18 22 In the subset of patients treated with biological therapies, patients treated with PARP inhibitors showed the lowest median value of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels, in line with the evidence that PARP deficiency may impair peripheral B-cell homeostasis and humoral response. 23 Interestingly, even if immunotherapy does not seem to affect the rate of seroconversion in cancer patients as previously reported, 24 , 25 the more pronounced decrease in antibody levels in the late timepoint that we observed in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors was consistent with two other reports about sustained antibody levels in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy-based treatments at the time of vaccination. 26 , 27 A possible explanation is that immune checkpoint inhibitors may have a positive acute effect, favoring a higher peak of antibody levels soon after the second dose, thus exaggerating the decrease in antibodies at late timepoints.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“… 18 22 In the subset of patients treated with biological therapies, patients treated with PARP inhibitors showed the lowest median value of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels, in line with the evidence that PARP deficiency may impair peripheral B-cell homeostasis and humoral response. 23 Interestingly, even if immunotherapy does not seem to affect the rate of seroconversion in cancer patients as previously reported, 24 , 25 the more pronounced decrease in antibody levels in the late timepoint that we observed in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors was consistent with two other reports about sustained antibody levels in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy-based treatments at the time of vaccination. 26 , 27 A possible explanation is that immune checkpoint inhibitors may have a positive acute effect, favoring a higher peak of antibody levels soon after the second dose, thus exaggerating the decrease in antibodies at late timepoints.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Several studies have reported that ICIs do not decrease the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines. 23,31 Notably, the adjusted ORs for seroprotection in patients receiving ICIs were 0.73 (0.11-4.99) for ≥1,084 U/mL on Architect and 0.54 (95% CI 0.07-3.83) for ≥150 U/mL on Elecsys after the second vaccination, which did not decrease as compared with that in All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In addition to the type of malignancy and anticancer treatment, patient’s demographic factors such as age and gender might also contribute to the rate of seroconversion in response to vaccination against COVID-19. Ma et al have shown that age is the most prominent predicting factor with regards to the failure of anti-COVID-19 vaccine in cancer patients and negatively correlates with seroconversion rate in these individuals ( 59 ). These results are consistent with another study on BNT162b2 vaccine which shows a remarkable difference between the seroconversion rate of young, versus elderly cancer patients, with the titer levels also being significantly different ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%