2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.02.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization of α-amylase onto poly(glycidyl methacrylate) grafted electrospun fibers by ATRP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting K m values were calculated as 0.839, 1.227, and 1.701 mg/mL, whereas V max values were 220.3, 48.85, and 37.12 mmol/min/mg for free, ESM-, and AgNP/ESM-immobilized a-amylases, respectively. The increase of K m and decrease of V max after immobilization showed the decrease of affinity between enzyme and substrate, which was consistent with previous reports [3,6,21,22]. This could be explained by the diffusional limitation of the substrate due to steric hindrance from the immobilizing supports, which caused lower accessibility of substrate to the active sites of the immobilized enzymes or conformational changes of the enzyme occurring in the immobilizing process which re sulted in a lower possibility of substrate-enzyme complex formation [3,8,20].…”
Section: Enzyme Kinetics Of Free and Immobilized A-amylasessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The resulting K m values were calculated as 0.839, 1.227, and 1.701 mg/mL, whereas V max values were 220.3, 48.85, and 37.12 mmol/min/mg for free, ESM-, and AgNP/ESM-immobilized a-amylases, respectively. The increase of K m and decrease of V max after immobilization showed the decrease of affinity between enzyme and substrate, which was consistent with previous reports [3,6,21,22]. This could be explained by the diffusional limitation of the substrate due to steric hindrance from the immobilizing supports, which caused lower accessibility of substrate to the active sites of the immobilized enzymes or conformational changes of the enzyme occurring in the immobilizing process which re sulted in a lower possibility of substrate-enzyme complex formation [3,8,20].…”
Section: Enzyme Kinetics Of Free and Immobilized A-amylasessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) is one of CRP, where a rapid dynamic equilibrium is created between a predominant amount of dormant chains and a low concentration of active propagating chains. Unexpected radical termination is not observed in this process .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Immobilized α-amylase retained 60% of the enzyme activity even after its 10 repeated uses. Oktay et al [57] described the immobilization of α-amylase onto polyvinyl alcohol-nanofibers functionalized with 2-bromoisobutyryl bromide and followed by surface initiated atom transfer radical polymerization of glycidyl methacrylate in a single step. The thermal stability of the enzyme was improved upon immobilization and its pH-optimum was shifted from pH 6.0 to 6.5.…”
Section: α-Amylasementioning
confidence: 99%