2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2013.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization of cellulase on magnetoresponsive graphene nano-supports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
49
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, the highest immobilization efficiency was observed for bgl on iron-based nanomaterials, rather than on functionalized GO. Similar immobilization efficiencies have been previously reported for bgl on magnetic nanoparticles (Ricco et al, 2014) or GO-iron nanoparticles hybrid nanomaterials (Gokhale et al, 2013;Ricco et al, 2014). It is interesting to note that the type of amine groups on the surface of the hybrid nanomaterial seems to affect the immobilization efficiency.…”
Section: Immobilization Yield and Activity Of Immobilized Bglsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More specifically, the highest immobilization efficiency was observed for bgl on iron-based nanomaterials, rather than on functionalized GO. Similar immobilization efficiencies have been previously reported for bgl on magnetic nanoparticles (Ricco et al, 2014) or GO-iron nanoparticles hybrid nanomaterials (Gokhale et al, 2013;Ricco et al, 2014). It is interesting to note that the type of amine groups on the surface of the hybrid nanomaterial seems to affect the immobilization efficiency.…”
Section: Immobilization Yield and Activity Of Immobilized Bglsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The functionalization of magnetic nanoparticles with carbon-based nanomaterials has recently attracted great interest as the resulting hybrid nanomaterials combine the properties of both building blocks. These hybrids can be applied in enzyme immobilization (Jiang et al, 2012;Gokhale et al, 2013) as well as in drug delivery (Yang et al, 2009;Mahmoudi et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be easily observed that in case of graphene the 2D peak is much narrower and its position is down-shifted. Another difference is observed in the Raman spectrum of graphite in which the 2D band is formed from two elements, namely 2D 1 and 2D 2 [45], which are roughly ¼ and ½ of the height of the G peak, respectively. Graphene exhibits a single sharp 2D signal, approximately four times more intense than G band [47].…”
Section: Graphene and Graphene Oxidementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, once functionalized with biomolecules like polysaccharides [41], proteins [42], etc. or other biological systems graphene can be integrated for developing new applications in biomedicine and bio-nanotechnology such as biosensors [43], biocatalysis [44], biofuel cells [45], etc.…”
Section: Graphene and Graphene Oxidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] From the past few decades, nanosized iron oxide particles have attracted great attention in the fields including, but not limited to, immunoassay, 4,5 biosensor, 6,7 bioseparation, 8,9 targeted drug delivery, 10,11 and environmental analysis 12,13 and protein immobilization. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] However, the bare Fe 3 O 4 NPs have high reactivity and easily undergo degradation upon direct exposing to certain environment, leading to poor stability and dispersity. Therefore, the surface of magnetic nanoparticles should be modified to improve the dispersity and biocompatibility, which could significantly facilitate its utilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%