2014
DOI: 10.4054/demres.2014.30.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immigrant fertility in Sweden, 2000-2011: A descriptive note

Abstract: BACKGROUNDModern Scandinavian population registers provide excellent data sources that allow a user to quickly gain an impression of the level of fertility and its structure across subpopulations. This may also allow the analyst to check a feature of the much-cited disruption hypothesis, at least in part. OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this note is to exploit this potential to give an overview of the structure of recent total fertility after immigration to Sweden from various groups of sending countries, separately f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These patterns are likely to reflect reasons for migration that differ systematically by age and country of birth (Robards and Berrington 2015;Berkeley, Khan, and Ambikaipaker 2006). Similar to previous findings from France (Toulemon 2004), Sweden (Persson and Hoem 2014), Norway (Østby 2002), and Italy (Mussino and Strozza 2012), high fertility was identified in years immediately after migration for migrants from low-income countries of birth -in this case Pakistan and Bangladesh. By contrast, women moving from countries of birth where education and work-related migration reasons are key (e.g., India, Poland) appear to delay childbearing until some years after migration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These patterns are likely to reflect reasons for migration that differ systematically by age and country of birth (Robards and Berrington 2015;Berkeley, Khan, and Ambikaipaker 2006). Similar to previous findings from France (Toulemon 2004), Sweden (Persson and Hoem 2014), Norway (Østby 2002), and Italy (Mussino and Strozza 2012), high fertility was identified in years immediately after migration for migrants from low-income countries of birth -in this case Pakistan and Bangladesh. By contrast, women moving from countries of birth where education and work-related migration reasons are key (e.g., India, Poland) appear to delay childbearing until some years after migration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Similar patterns were also reported by Mussino et al (2015) in their study on fertility of immigrants in the Lombardy region of Italy. A study by Persson and Hoem (2014) on Sweden is another good example demonstrating significant fertility differences between marriage-related migrants and other migrants. Fertility levels were significantly elevated after migration for immigrants from low-income non-European countries, suggesting that family formation was the main reason for their migration.…”
Section: Recent Research On Childbearing Patterns Among Immigrants Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also holds true for Sweden (e.g., Scott 2005, 2007;Persson and Hoem 2014). The focus is often on immigrants from high-fertility countries to those with lower fertility, with research focusing on the interdependencies of migration and childbearing trajectories (Kulu and Milewski 2007) and the fertility adaptation of migrants in different settings in Europe and North America (e.g., Kahn 1988;Ford 1990;Andersson 2004;Kulu 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%