Immediate provisional restoration of single‐piece zirconia implants: a prospective case series – results after 24 months of clinical function

Payer, Michael; Arnetzl, Vincent; Kirmeier, Robert; Koller, Martin; Arnetzl, G; Jakse, Norbert

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02425.x

Cited by 78 publications

(105 citation statements)

References 55 publications

(110 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition to the peri implant evaluations, the adjacent teeth were frequently taken as references. In one investigation, solely a "healthy soft tissue" (Jung et al 2015) in the peri-implant area was described, whereas others found decreased bleeding and plaque indices in the course of the follow-ups (Kohal et al 2012;Kohal et al 2013;Payer et al 2013).…”

Section: Soft Tissue Parametersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considering the available data exceeding one year of observation, an expected decrease of 0.05% per year afterwards was calculated (Figure 3). Most of the implant failures occurred in the early period after placement (Cannizzaro et al 2010;Grassi et al 2015;Jung et al 2015;Kohal et al 2012;Payer et al 2013;Spies et al 2015a). …”

Section: Implant Survival (Figure 2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the included studies, six solely addressed single tooth replacements (Cannizzaro et al 2010;Gahlert et al 2015;Grassi et al 2015;Kohal et al 2012;Payer et al 2013;Payer et al 2015), whereas only one study solely considered multiple lost teeth, rehabilitated with 3-unit fixed dental prostheses (Kohal et al 2013). Finally, two studies included both indication types (Jung et al 2015;Spies et al 2015a) and were, therefore, split in two independent cohorts according to the type of restoration (SC or FDP) and analyzed separately.…”

Section: Type Of Restorationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia Dental Implants: A Systematic Review

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To determine the survival rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) of zirconia dental implants restored with single crowns or fixed dental prostheses. An electronic search was conducted up to November 2015 (without any restriction regarding the publication time) through the databases MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, and EMBASE to identify randomized controlled clinical trials and prospective clinical trials including >15 patients. Primary outcomes were survival rate and MBL. Furthermore, the influence of several covariates on MBL was evaluated. Qualitative assessment and statistical analyses were performed. This review was conducted according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews. With the applied search strategy, 4,196 titles could be identified. After a screening procedure, 2 randomized controlled clinical trials and 7 prospective clinical trials remained for analyses. In these trials, a total of 326 patients received 398 implants. The follow-up ranged from 12 to 60 mo. Implant loss was mostly reported within the first year, especially within the healing period. Thereafter, nearly constant survival curves could be observed. Therefore, separate meta-analyses were performed for the first and subsequent years, resulting in an implant survival rate of 95.6% (95% confidence interval: 93.3% to 97.9%) after 12 mo and, thereafter, an expected decrease of 0.05% per year (0.25% after 5 y). Additionally, a meta-analysis was conducted for the mean MBL after 12 mo, resulting in 0.79 mm (95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 0.86 mm). Implant bulk material and design, restoration type, and the application of minor augmentation procedures during surgery, as well as the modes of temporization and loading, had no statistically significant influence on MBL. The short-term cumulative survival rates and the MBL of zirconia implants in the presented systematic review are promising. However, additional data are still needed to confirm the long-term predictability of these implants. analyses. In these trials, a total of 326 patients received 398 implants. The follow-up ranged from 12 to 60 months. Implant loss was mostly reported within the first year, especially within the healing period. Thereafter, nearly constant survival curves could be observed. Therefore, separate meta-analyses were performed for the first and subsequent years, resulting in a survival rate of the implants of 95.6% (95%CI:93.3% -97.9%) after 12 months, and thereafter an expected decrease of 0.05% per year (0.25% after 5 years). Additionally, a meta-analysis was conducted for the mean MBL after 12 months, resulting in 0.79 mm of MBL (95%CI: 0.73 mm -0.86 mm).Implant bulk material, implant design, restoration type, the application of minor augmentation procedures during surgery as well as the modes of temporization and loading had no statistically significant influence on MBL.Conclusions: The short-term cumulative survival rates and the MBL of zirconia implants in the presented systemati...

show abstract

Section: Soft Tissue Parametersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Implant Survival (Figure 2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Type Of Restorationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia Dental Implants: A Systematic Review

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The number of participants in the studies ranged between 5 and 74. Eleven studies 1,3,4,23,24,26,27,[29][30][31][32] reported the mean age of participants, which was between 38.5 years and 62 years (age range 18 to 80). Ten studies 1,3,23,26-32 reported the percentage of female participants, which ranged between 6% and 57.5% (Table 1).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crestal bone loss and periimplant inflammatory parameters around zirconia implants: A systematic review

Vohra

Al-Kheraif

Ghani

et al. 2015

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However loading forces emerge on the supramucosal part of the implant by mastication and tongue movements immediately after placement, and there is limited data on this topic. 28,29 Kohal et al reported 95.4% survival rate for one-piece zirconia implants for single-tooth replacement after 1 year which is comparable with titanium implants. 11 However, the radiographic bone loss after 1 year (>2 mm) was higher than titanium implants.…”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 89%

Reconstruction of Single Tooth Loss with One-Piece and Two-Piece Zirconia Implants: Case Report

Bal¹,

Kurt²,

Güngör³

et al. 2016

Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci Cases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Immediate provisional restoration of single‐piece zirconia implants: a prospective case series – results after 24 months of clinical function

Abstract: Clinical and radiographic parameters demonstrated a 95% integration of immediately loaded zirconia single-piece implants. A long-term randomized-controlled clinical trial was initiated to confirm evidence of this protocol.

Cited by 78 publications

References 55 publications

Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia Dental Implants: A Systematic Review

Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia Dental Implants: A Systematic Review

Crestal bone loss and periimplant inflammatory parameters around zirconia implants: A systematic review

Reconstruction of Single Tooth Loss with One-Piece and Two-Piece Zirconia Implants: Case Report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About