Immediate Placement of Implants Into Infected Sites: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Waasdorp, Jonathan; Evian, Cyril I.; Mandracchia, Martine

doi:10.1902/jop.2010.090706

Cited by 126 publications

(114 citation statements)

References 30 publications

(74 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Immediate implantation is usually avoided, however, at sites showing signs of infection, whether periodontal or endodontic 57) . Some studies have suggested that immediate implant placement should be contraindicated in the presence of infectious disease due to fear of failure of osseointegration.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of PRF and Allograft Use on Immediate Implants at Extraction Sockets with Periapical Infection —Clinical and Cone Beam CT Findings—

Medikeri

Meharwade

Wate

et al. 2018

Bull. Tokyo Dent. Coll.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Immediate implant placement can be successful, even at infected sites. The adjunctive effects of concomitant use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and decalcified freeze-dried bone allografts (DFDBA) at periapically infected sites remains to be determined, however. The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the effect of combined use of PRF and DFDBA on immediate implant survival at tooth extraction sites exhibiting periapical lesions. Implants were immediately placed in 8 patients under a standard chemotherapeutic protocol. Adin titanium implants were used in all cases. The combination of PRF and DFDBA was used to fill the gap between the implant body and the surrounding socket wall. The final restoration was placed after 3 months. The full-mouth plaque, gingival bleeding index, and gingival esthetics scores were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Cone beam computed tomography images obtained at baseline and at 12 months after implant loading were analyzed. The plaque index scores showed statistically significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months (p<0.05). The gingival bleeding index score showed no significant difference. No difference was noted in buccal gingival level on the implant surface or adjacent teeth at 91.7% of sites. Complete closure of the interproximal space was seen in 91.7% of the implant sites. Crestal bone levels on all implant surfaces were non-significant. Implant survival was 91.67% at 12 months. The adjunctive use of PRF with DFDBA at periapically infected sites yielded a significant reduction in bone resorption and accelerated bone healing during the initial post-extraction stage. A significant improvement was achieved in the gingival esthetic score at the interproximal and midfacial surfaces. The combined use of growth factors with pre-and postoperative broadspectrum antibiotics over a short time resulted in a higher implant survival rate at the end of the 1 year post-restoration period.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of PRF and Allograft Use on Immediate Implants at Extraction Sockets with Periapical Infection —Clinical and Cone Beam CT Findings—

Medikeri

Meharwade

Wate

et al. 2018

Bull. Tokyo Dent. Coll.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cependant, d'autres études vont plus loin et considèrent que l'implantation immédiate peut prévenir la résorption osseuse [38], tandis que d'autres auteurs ont suggéré que le placement immédiat de l'implant dans un site infecté est contre-indiqué [40,41]. …”

Section: Approche Et T Echnique Chirurgicale (Appréciation Manuelle Dunclassified

Concept esthétique et non invasif pour l’implantation des secteurs antérieurs des maxillaires

Himdani¹

2014

Actual. Odonto-Stomatol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Recent comparative studies conclude that similar success rates have been reported for implants placed into infected sites compared to implants placed in non-infected sites. 1 Studies suggest that the presence of chronic infection, periapical or periodontal, does not modify osseointegration. 2 The placement of immediate implants represents an alternative to compromised teeth involved with infectious conditions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Intra-osseous Stability of Immediately Placed Implantsinto Infected Alveolar Socket

Mishra¹,

Agrawal²,

Singh³

et al. 2016

IOSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Immediate Placement of Implants Into Infected Sites: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Cited by 126 publications

References 30 publications

Effect of PRF and Allograft Use on Immediate Implants at Extraction Sockets with Periapical Infection —Clinical and Cone Beam CT Findings—

Effect of PRF and Allograft Use on Immediate Implants at Extraction Sockets with Periapical Infection —Clinical and Cone Beam CT Findings—

Concept esthétique et non invasif pour l’implantation des secteurs antérieurs des maxillaires

Evaluation of Intra-osseous Stability of Immediately Placed Implantsinto Infected Alveolar Socket

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About