Immediate and 1-Year Chest Compression Quality

Griffin, Peter; Cooper, Clayton S.; Glick, Joshua; Terndrup, Thomas E.

doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000030

Cited by 12 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The targeted instruction and use of feedback could have a positive influence on the depth. In the case of feedback devices, several studies had reported that the quality of chest compressions was improved, 3,4,6,18,19 although the quality of resuscitation may vary depending of feedback device used. 20 The quality of rescue breaths was very poor in all three groups with reference to pre-test and post-test.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Benefits of Visual Feedback on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: A Non‐Randomised Manikin Study with Bystanders

Abelairas‐Gómez

Gili-Roig

García

et al. 2017

Hong Kong j. emerg. med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is vital for the survival of people who has suffered a cardiac arrest. In order to achieve a good quality CPR performance, rescuer needs a good training which could be gotten with the use of feedback devices. The aim of this study was to compare the use of visual feedback device in CPR training to learning without feedback. Methods Ninety-nine subjects without basic life support knowledge participating in the study were divided into three groups. All of them carried out two tests: 2 minutes of CPR with compressions and ventilations. First two groups received trainings on CPR between the tests (experimental groups): one group with instructor-led training and the other one with visual feedback device. The third group did not receive any training between the tests (control group). Results In the first test no differences among the three groups were found. The experimental groups improved their scores in the last test. The number of correct chest compressions by hand position and depth, and the number of correct rescue breaths was increased. The experimental group with visual feedback CPR training achieved better scores of quality CPR in the second test than the instructor-led training group. Conclusions The visual feedback and instruction-led training have positive effects on the quality CPR. The use of visual feedback during learning has greater benefits than instruction-led training in the three variables analysed.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Benefits of Visual Feedback on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: A Non‐Randomised Manikin Study with Bystanders

Abelairas‐Gómez

Gili-Roig

García

et al. 2017

Hong Kong j. emerg. med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…lww.com/SIH/A747). 46,67,74,77,79,[81][82][83]86,89,92,93,96,105,109,138,139 Most studies were on BLS training and generally showed a significant benefit of objective and real-time feedback from feedback devices when compared with no feedback (from device or instructor) or instructor-feedback only (without a feedback device). 67,74,92 Most studies assessed CPR quality immediately after training, but 1 study suggested that real-time audiovisual feedback may improve skill retention at 3 months.…”

Section: Feedback Devicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training for Healthcare Professionals

Lauridsen¹,

Løfgren²,

Brogaard³

et al. 2021

Sim Healthcare

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary StatementThe optimal strategy for training cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for healthcare professionals remains to be determined. This scoping review aimed to describe the emerging evidence for CPR training for healthcare professionals.We screened 7605 abstracts and included 110 studies in this scoping review on CPR training for healthcare professionals. We assessed the included articles for evidence for the following topics: training duration, retraining intervals, e-learning, virtual reality/augmented reality/gamified learning, instructor-learner ratio, equipment and manikins, other aspects of contextual learning content, feedback devices, and feedback/debriefing. We found emerging evidence supporting the use of low-dose, high-frequency training with e-learning to achieve knowledge, feedback devices to perform high-quality chest compressions, and in situ team simulations with debriefings to improve the performance of provider teams.

show abstract

“…The first 331 reported no difference in CPR performance between a group of laypeople trained with a CPR feedback device compared with a control group at 1 year after training. In the second study of CPR training of healthcare providers, 319 both control and feedback groups improved from baseline at 1 year after training, but there was no difference between the control and feedback groups.…”

Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning

confidence: 92%

“…325 Five studies showed improvement in CPR skills at the end of training with the use of feedback devices compared with no feedback device. 319,320,323,328,330 Two studies showed no difference in performance. 322,326 One study showed worse CPR performance at the conclusion of training, although this study has a high risk of bias because of unclear outcome definitions and the use of the audiovisual feedback system to replace an instructor.…”

Section: Cpr Performance From Training Conclusion To 1 Year Aftermentioning

confidence: 98%