2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14481-3_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imitation and Quality of Tags in Social Bookmarking Systems – Collective Intelligence Leading to Folksonomies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others focus on quantitative, empirical studies (e.g. Floeck et al 2011). Others predominantly conduct case studies with qualitative methods (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Others focus on quantitative, empirical studies (e.g. Floeck et al 2011). Others predominantly conduct case studies with qualitative methods (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The tags are displayed prominently on the website's UI which enhances the social proof effect (Floeck et al, 2011;Golder et al, 2006), thus many of the tags are incorporated in the terminology of online community. In fact, our chosen query set belongs to the intersection between the NCRV tags and the online community's search terminology as witnessed by Fig.…”
Section: Ground Truthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in [14] the inter-indexer consistency is measured in terms of the tag reuse rate, i. e. by the average number of users who apply a tag. Finally, in several other studies [3,6,7,10] a smaller size of the final vocabulary is taken as an indicator for the consensus among the users. In all these studies, it has been shown that recommending tags based on the tag assignments of other users leads to a higher interindexer consistency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By looking at the literature about tagging systems (see Section 2), two measures related to the inter-indexer consistency can be identified: The tag reuse rate from [14] and the size of the vocabulary [3,6,7,10]. The global vocabulary size is not a good measure for the inter-indexer consistency because it is not only influenced by the overlap of the users' vocabularies or the inter-indexer consistency respectively but also by the average size of the users' vocabularies.…”
Section: Measuring the Inter-indexer Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation