1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70010417.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging the Brain Marijuana Receptor: Development of a Radioligand that Binds to Cannabinoid CB1 Receptors In Vivo

Abstract: Abstract:The major active ingredient of marijuana, (-)-z~9 -tetrahydrocannabinol, exerts its psychoactive effects via binding to cannabinoid CB1 receptors, which are widely distributed in the brain. Radionuclide imaging of CB1 receptors in living human subjects would help explore the presently unknown physiological roles of this receptor system, as well as the neurochemical consequences of marijuana dependence. Currently available cannabinoid receptor radioligands are exceedingly lipophilic and unsuitable for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
74
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…with AM1241 (0.33 mg/kg) that were blocked by AM630 (1 mg/kg) but not by AM251 (1 mg/kg). In spite of CB 2 R being present in the CNS also under normal, non-pathological conditions (Gong et al 2006;Van Sickle et al 2005), above DD data suggest minimal, if any contribution of this cannabinoid receptor subtype for behaviors primarily related to CB 1 R activation/inactivation. Although we do not have a ready explanation for the U-shaped dose-response curve in tests with AM630, the results again indicate that a cannabinoid ligand administered in pure DMSO do not necessarily lead to reduced drinking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with AM1241 (0.33 mg/kg) that were blocked by AM630 (1 mg/kg) but not by AM251 (1 mg/kg). In spite of CB 2 R being present in the CNS also under normal, non-pathological conditions (Gong et al 2006;Van Sickle et al 2005), above DD data suggest minimal, if any contribution of this cannabinoid receptor subtype for behaviors primarily related to CB 1 R activation/inactivation. Although we do not have a ready explanation for the U-shaped dose-response curve in tests with AM630, the results again indicate that a cannabinoid ligand administered in pure DMSO do not necessarily lead to reduced drinking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…By comparison, test results with rimonabant in DMSO did not seem to differ substantially from tests where rimonabant was delivered as a suspension (as revealed by similar and nonsignificant ED 50 values for the two sets of tests). However, it is possible that enhanced uptake from the peritoneal cavity coupled with the drug's ability to more readily penetrate the blood-brain barrier, resulting in a comparatively rapid increase in brain drug concentrations (Gatley et al 1998), might explain the unconditioned effects. DMSO alone exerted a modest but statistically significant reduction in fluid intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the presence of functional α7 nACh receptors in principal neurons of either the hippocampus or the dentate gyrus is controversial, as observations suggesting functional α7 nACh receptors in hippocampal gultamatergic neurons have not been replicated by others (Frazier et al, 1998b;Khiroug et al, 2003;Sudweeks and Yakel, 2000). Activation of α7 nACh receptors located on interneurons within the stratum (s.) oriens mediates strong excitatory effects that result in an increase of GABAergic neurotransmission (Jones and Yakel, 1997;Alkondon et al, 1998; Frazier et al, 1998a,b;McQuiston and Madison, 1999;Shao and Yakel, 2000;Sudweeks and Yakel, 2000;Buhler and Dunwiddie, 2002;Khiroug et al, 2003).Hippocampal GABAergic neurotransmission is also regulated by the cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) receptors, which are highly expressed in hippocampal interneurons (Mailleux and Vanderhaeghen, 1992;Matsuda et al, 1993;Gatley et al, 1998;Tsou et al, 1998). These CB1 interneurons contain cholecystokinin (CCK) (Katona et al, 1999;Marsicano and Lutz, 1999;Tsou et al, 1999) and co-express the subunit A of the 5-HT 3 R (Hermann et al, 2002;Morales and Backman, 2002;Morales et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hippocampal GABAergic neurotransmission is also regulated by the cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) receptors, which are highly expressed in hippocampal interneurons (Mailleux and Vanderhaeghen, 1992;Matsuda et al, 1993;Gatley et al, 1998;Tsou et al, 1998). These CB1 interneurons contain cholecystokinin (CCK) (Katona et al, 1999;Marsicano and Lutz, 1999;Tsou et al, 1999) and co-express the subunit A of the 5-HT 3 R (Hermann et al, 2002;Morales and Backman, 2002;Morales et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) and induc- (Portier et al, 1999). In mammalian neuronal cells, CB modulation of N-and P/Q-type ion channels is altered by SR 141716A (Twitchell et al, 1997), an analog of AM 281 (Gatley et al, 1998). Thus, the reversal/inhibition by CB receptor antagonists of NAE 14:0-induced responses in tobacco cell suspensions and leaves suggests the parallel existence of a mammalian-like endocannabinoid system where NAE 14:0 mediates its function by binding to a CB receptor-like binding protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%