2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2014.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging subducted slab structure beneath the Sea of Okhotsk with teleseismic waveforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth of~3-5% from previous waveform modeling studies for the dipping part of the subducted slab (Chen et al, 2007;Ding & Grand, 1994;Zhan et al, 2014). We also noticed that in these two recent tomographic models, the stagnant slab has a smaller velocity anomaly than the dipping part.…”
Section: 1029/2018jb016642supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth of~3-5% from previous waveform modeling studies for the dipping part of the subducted slab (Chen et al, 2007;Ding & Grand, 1994;Zhan et al, 2014). We also noticed that in these two recent tomographic models, the stagnant slab has a smaller velocity anomaly than the dipping part.…”
Section: 1029/2018jb016642supporting
confidence: 61%
“…We first tested our initial model by P wave triplicated waveform modeling for all the three events and then further verified and refined our model by S wave triplicated waveform modeling (next section). The recent two tomographic studies (Fukao & Obayashi, ; Tang et al, ) report ~+1% and ~+1.5% P wave velocity anomaly for the stagnant and downgoing slab, respectively, which are typically smaller than the results of ~3–5% from previous waveform modeling studies for the dipping part of the subducted slab (Chen et al, ; Ding & Grand, ; Zhan et al, ). We also noticed that in these two recent tomographic models, the stagnant slab has a smaller velocity anomaly than the dipping part.…”
Section: Construction Of the 2‐d Slab Modelmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Moreover, models produced via tomographic methods may underestimate the strengths of such anomalies. For example, the velocity perturbations representative of slab‐like structures are generally smaller in tomographic images than in those inferred from recent waveform modeling endeavors (Zhan et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, relatively steep ray paths (such as SKS) can be used to define local boundary sharpness and small features such as ULVZs using the SPdKS arrival. Defining the boundaries of the mid-Pacific LLSVP has been difficult using seismic tomographic methods (Text S2), especially considering uncertainty in event locations caused by slab structure (Lu & Grand, 2016;Zhan et al, 2014). In contrast, the LLVSP beneath the mid-Pacific is more difficult to define because of the few seismic stations available regionally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The northeastern boundary of the mid-Pacific LLSVP beneath southeastern Hawaii has been extensively probed (Figure 1a), and many complexities have been revealed. Defining the boundaries of the mid-Pacific LLSVP has been difficult using seismic tomographic methods (Text S2), especially considering uncertainty in event locations caused by slab structure (Lu & Grand, 2016;Zhan et al, 2014). A more detailed discussion of the tomographic models can be found in Text S2 (Chu et al, 2017;Gaherty et al, 1996Gaherty et al, , 1999Lai et al, 2017;Ritsema et al, 2011;Simmons et al, 2012;Tan & Helmberger, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%