Abstract:Osteoarthritis is thought to be caused by a combination of intrinsic vulnerabilities of the joint, such as anatomic shape and alignment, and environmental factors, such as body weight, injury, and overuse. It has been postulated that much of osteoarthritis is due to anatomic deformities. Advances in surgical techniques such as the periacetabular osteotomy, safe surgical dislocation of the hip, and hip arthroscopy have provided us with effective and safe tools to correct these anatomical problems. The limiting … Show more
“…Patients with DDH are considered to be at risk for having OA develop owing to the loss of GAG as an early event in the development of hip OA [16]. Therefore, observation of cartilage integrity and the amount of GAG is important in evaluating the effect of joint-preserving hip surgery on OA progression [17,25].…”
The dGEMRIC index shows a global decrease, whereas tissue loss is more localized. This suggests that hip osteoarthritis in acetabular dysplasia is a biologically mediated event that affects the entire joint.
“…Patients with DDH are considered to be at risk for having OA develop owing to the loss of GAG as an early event in the development of hip OA [16]. Therefore, observation of cartilage integrity and the amount of GAG is important in evaluating the effect of joint-preserving hip surgery on OA progression [17,25].…”
The dGEMRIC index shows a global decrease, whereas tissue loss is more localized. This suggests that hip osteoarthritis in acetabular dysplasia is a biologically mediated event that affects the entire joint.
“…We determined the LCE angle, Tönnis angle, and extrusion index on AP radiographs and the ACE angle on false-profile views using OsiriX Version 3.9 (Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland) and the OsiriX plug-in Orthopaedic Studio Version 1.2 (Carl Siversson, Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; http://orthostudio.spectronic.se) manually using standard technique as previously described [19]. The same observers evaluated acetabular retroversion with use of the criteria proposed by Reynolds et al [30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAI is defined as the abutment between the proximal femur and the acetabular rim, either as a result of reduced femoral head-neck offset (cam type) or acetabular (pincer type) overcoverage or both [14,15]. Ganz et al [14] and others [19] have emphasized the importance of detection of such anatomic abnormalities of the hip, which may lead to pain and osteoarthritis (OA) in young adults [14,19]. In most cases, a combination of cam and pincer forms is present called mixed-type impingement [3].…”
Background Although morphometric hip parameters measured on radiographs are valuable tools guiding diagnosis and therapy in patients with hip disorders, some clinicians use MRI for such measurements, although it is unclear whether the parameters assessed on MRI differ from those assessed on radiographs. Questions/purposes We asked whether the lateral centeredge angle (LCE), Tönnis angle, extrusion index, and anterior center-edge angle (ACE) are similar on MRI and radiography. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the imaging data of 103 hips from 103 patients: 46 with femoroacetabular impingement and 57 with hip dysplasia. We manually measured the LCE, Tönnis angle, extrusion index, and ACE from radiographs and MRI in all 103 hips. Four straight coronal (Ant-10 mm, Ant-5 mm, Center, and Post-5 mm), three straight sagittal (S-Med-5 mm, S-Center, S-Lat-5 mm), and three 258 oblique sagittal (OS-Med-5 mm, OS-Center, OS-Lat-5 mm) reformats were reconstructed from a three-dimensional isotropic morphologic MRI sequence. MRI measurements were compared against the gold standard radiographic measurements. Results We found good agreement for the LCE angle, Tönnis angle, and extrusion index between radiographic and coronal slice MRI measurements. The mean differences between radiographic and MRI measurements were 58 or less or 5% or less (for the extrusion index) in all coronal MRI slices. However, the differences between ACE angles on sagittal MRI slices and radiographs ranged from 5°to 288. Conclusions LCE, Tönnis angle, and extrusion index can be measured on MRI with comparable results to radiography. The ACE angle on radiographs cannot be estimated reliably from MRI. Clinical Relevance MRI provides similar morphometric measurements as radiography for most hip parameters, except for the ACE angle.
“…However, the unaffected hip is commonly used as control in studies on unilateral hip conditions. 11 In four hips of this group, low-degree cartilage defects could be observed. It may be possible that in healthy patients without history of hip disorders, the penetration of Gd-DTPA 2into cartilage matrix may have been even lower, resulting in higher dGEMRIC values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The use of MRI is an established method for assessing osteoarthritic cartilage changes. [9][10][11] The modified classification according to Outerbridge has gained acceptance in the grading of morphological cartilage damage. [12][13][14] High validity of the Outerbridge classification based on morphologic MRI cartilage sequences was noted by direct comparison with arthroscopic examinations in the knee joint and subtalar joint.…”
Our results suggest that dGEMRIC at 1.5 T is suitable to assess cartilage quality changes in the long-term follow-up after LCPD. The evaluation of biochemical cartilage quality with dGEMRIC may provide additional information about early cartilage changes occurring without visible alterations of cartilage morphology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.