2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging Recognition of Morphological Variants at the Midcarpal Joint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
26
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(92 reference statements)
9
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our results, plain radiographs, 2D-CT, 3D-CT, and MRI were all unable to reliably predict X-ray plain radiography, 2D-CT two-dimensional computed tomography, 3D-CT three-dimensional computed tomography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value capitate morphology and specific detection of V-shaped capitates was poor. These findings corroborate a study by McLean et al which concluded that direct visualization (i.e., surgical dissection) was necessary to determine V-shaped capitates [7]. Our data demonstrate that the most sensitive and specific modality for determining capitate morphology was 2D-CT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on our results, plain radiographs, 2D-CT, 3D-CT, and MRI were all unable to reliably predict X-ray plain radiography, 2D-CT two-dimensional computed tomography, 3D-CT three-dimensional computed tomography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value capitate morphology and specific detection of V-shaped capitates was poor. These findings corroborate a study by McLean et al which concluded that direct visualization (i.e., surgical dissection) was necessary to determine V-shaped capitates [7]. Our data demonstrate that the most sensitive and specific modality for determining capitate morphology was 2D-CT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Each specimen was thawed and prepared for radiographic analysis. For each specimen, three views (anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique views) of the wrist were obtained using standard protocols for plain film imaging [7]. The wrists were held in neutral radioulnar deviation, and straight alignment was maintained between the long finger metacarpal, capitate, and radius.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neutral wrist position on radiography was defined as less than a 20-degree angle between the axes of the radius and third metacarpal bone. MR arthrography was considered our reference standard for classifying lunate morphology because its accuracy for this purpose is comparable with anatomic dissection [18]. Due to sex-specific data regarding C-T distance being unavailable before we started the study, we were unable to determine sample sizes a priori .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been widely used in clinical musculoskeletal evaluation diagnosis (Chang et al, 2007; Feydy et al, 2009; Hayter et al, 2013; McLean et al, 2009). MRI has been used in research to assess joint contact areas (Johnson et al, 2013a; Pillai et al, 2007), kinematics (Goto et al, 2005; Patterson et al, 2007), and cartilage deformation (McLean et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI has been used in research to assess joint contact areas (Johnson et al, 2013a; Pillai et al, 2007), kinematics (Goto et al, 2005; Patterson et al, 2007), and cartilage deformation (McLean et al, 2009). MRI-based surface contact modeling can be used to evaluate contact mechanics (Johnson et al, 2013a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%