1995
DOI: 10.2307/1312677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging Radar for Ecosystem Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…QSCAT observations are not impacted by cloud cover, atmospheric aerosol and radiation condition, and are sensitive to the structure and water content of forest canopy, providing a reliable remote sensing technique rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil Trans R Soc B 368: 20120306 to monitor impact of climate on tropical forests [17,18,26]. Given the high frequency (2.2 cm) and the steep incidence angle (468-548) of the QSCAT radar, the backscatter measurement over dense tropical forests is sensitive only to the top canopy structure and moisture and has relatively no information about the underlying soil moisture [27][28][29][30][31] (see the electronic supplementary material). We used 4-day composited QSCAT backscatter data (s 0 ) with enhanced resolutions of 4.45 km at H polarization in ascending mode from morning passes (6.00 LST) to create backscatter anomalies of monthly, seasonal and DQ (averaged backscatter values of three consecutive months with lowest monthly backscatter values) for the entire time series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QSCAT observations are not impacted by cloud cover, atmospheric aerosol and radiation condition, and are sensitive to the structure and water content of forest canopy, providing a reliable remote sensing technique rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil Trans R Soc B 368: 20120306 to monitor impact of climate on tropical forests [17,18,26]. Given the high frequency (2.2 cm) and the steep incidence angle (468-548) of the QSCAT radar, the backscatter measurement over dense tropical forests is sensitive only to the top canopy structure and moisture and has relatively no information about the underlying soil moisture [27][28][29][30][31] (see the electronic supplementary material). We used 4-day composited QSCAT backscatter data (s 0 ) with enhanced resolutions of 4.45 km at H polarization in ascending mode from morning passes (6.00 LST) to create backscatter anomalies of monthly, seasonal and DQ (averaged backscatter values of three consecutive months with lowest monthly backscatter values) for the entire time series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found the strongest relationship between biomass and the NIR band, with an R One of the major limitations of using satellite or CIR imagery to estimate aboveground biomass is the so-called "saturation problem," wherein optical/infrared sensors are unable to distinguish variations in green biomass in areas of dense vegetation canopies. This saturation occurs when the canopy closure and leaf area density reach a threshold (varies by vegetation type) beyond which the optical/infrared sensor cannot detect increasing levels of green biomass response [14,15]. To address this problem, it has been proposed that biomass estimation could be improved by combining imagery from optical/infrared sensors with data acquired from active remote sensors, such as radar and airborne laser scanning (ALS, commonly referred to as "lidar" (light detection and ranging)) [14,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This saturation occurs when the canopy closure and leaf area density reach a threshold (varies by vegetation type) beyond which the optical/infrared sensor cannot detect increasing levels of green biomass response [14,15]. To address this problem, it has been proposed that biomass estimation could be improved by combining imagery from optical/infrared sensors with data acquired from active remote sensors, such as radar and airborne laser scanning (ALS, commonly referred to as "lidar" (light detection and ranging)) [14,16]. These active sensors provide additional information about topography and/or vegetation height that could potentially improve the quantitative models developed to predict aboveground biomass and other vegetation characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In undisturbed environments (no buildings or agriculture) it can be assumed that scattering is governed by soil type and vegetation cover. The influence of vascular plants on signal interaction is, however, limited at C band (approximately 5.6 cm wavelength; Waring et al, 1995). Surface roughness thus plays an important role for spatial differences in backscatter during frozen conditions in tundra regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%