2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging pitfalls in paediatric posterior fossa neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differential diagnosis of brainstem lesions in children is challenging as pediatric brainstem tumors are among the most common lesions [ 9 ]. DIPG or DMG, one the most common brainstem tumors, shows typical radiographic features on MRI of infiltrating the majority of the pons, hypo/iso-intensity on T1-weighted imaging, hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging, and, frequently, ventral involvement of the pons with encasement of the basilar artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential diagnosis of brainstem lesions in children is challenging as pediatric brainstem tumors are among the most common lesions [ 9 ]. DIPG or DMG, one the most common brainstem tumors, shows typical radiographic features on MRI of infiltrating the majority of the pons, hypo/iso-intensity on T1-weighted imaging, hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging, and, frequently, ventral involvement of the pons with encasement of the basilar artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the image quality of iUS2 was affected by surgery, resulting in generally poorer images than those acquired before tumor debulking. As described by multiple studies [12,19,24,25], acoustic enhancing artifacts (AEA), contusion, and edema are hyperechoic and could be mistaken for residual tumor, which could have led to suboptimal tumor segmentations in the iUS2 images. Clinically, this does not necessarily lead to additional tumor resection, but rather a direction of the surgeon's attention to the suspected area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to evaluate tumor location and impact on surrounding structures, it is of limited diagnostic value. Radiological differentiation between different PFTs is difficult and can be further complicated by tumor mimics such as demyelinating disorders and Alexander disease [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%