2008
DOI: 10.1136/emj.2007.051862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging paediatric blunt abdominal trauma in the emergency department: ultrasound versus computed tomography

Abstract: Abdominal USS performed by paediatric radiologists is an accurate method of assessing abdominal injuries. However, CT scanning can assess certain abnormalities such as pancreatic or duodenal injuries and small amounts of free intraperitoneal air more accurately. The importance of serial clinical examination must not be overlooked.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 So far, US seems to be an efficient method of evaluation for hemodynamically stable children with pelvic fluid, as it has no radiation risk, it can be used repeatedly, and it is a fast, reliable, and easy to use side-by tool of radiology. US was also stated as an efficient and valuable primary tool in children with BAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 So far, US seems to be an efficient method of evaluation for hemodynamically stable children with pelvic fluid, as it has no radiation risk, it can be used repeatedly, and it is a fast, reliable, and easy to use side-by tool of radiology. US was also stated as an efficient and valuable primary tool in children with BAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The knowledge and experience with US technique, which is a radiation-free method, in the management of patients with BAT will gradually decrease unnecessary CT examinations and radiation exposures. Although the management of BAT patients with normal abdominal US involves a routine procedure, the clinical procedures for patients with some pathological findings in US may vary in different centers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multidetector CT provides a good overview of many types of injuries, including most pancreatic injuries, and is often the first choice and standard within diagnostic imaging (33,34). However, pancreatic injuries can remain undetected by CT scans, and several studies recommend using a combination of imaging methods, such as CT supported by MRCP and ERCP (33,34).…”
Section: Diagnostic Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, pancreatic injuries can remain undetected by CT scans, and several studies recommend using a combination of imaging methods, such as CT supported by MRCP and ERCP (33,34). Newer methods such as secretin-enhanced MRCP may provide an even sounder diagnosis, but specific data on this in cases of pancreatic trauma have not been found, nor is this examination available at all hospitals.…”
Section: Diagnostic Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] However, there is a difference in the opinion as to the usefulness and diagnostic value of abdominal ultrasound scan. [456] While some hold the view that it only finds use in rapid evaluation for the detection of hemoperitoneum in the increasingly popular focused assessment sonography for trauma, others opine that it could, in addition, also identify significant parenchymal injuries. Some posit that it has a limited diagnostic accuracy and could engender undue delay in intervention in some patients who turn out to be false negatives (FNs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%