“…This may have been due to edema, which is known to cause marked alteration of echogenicity, or by scar tissue or callus around the nerve. 38 The nerve may also be difficult to visualize when it is surrounded by fat, which has similar echogenic properties to nerve tissue. US frequencies also play a role in the visibility of the nerve; in the current study, 18 MHZ was used, but higher frequencies are available, such as 22 MHZ, as utilized by Liu et al 39 Other complicating factors in routine imaging of the sural nerve can be its small size, large number of terminal branches, and anatomical differences between patients.…”