2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2015.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging for Urinary Stones: Update in 2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
12
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Good imaging assessment before surgery is essential for surgical planning. CT remains the gold standard for diagnosing urolithiasis, with the advantages of being readily available, having higher diagnostic accuracy, faster imaging acquisition and shorter evaluation time . CT also can evaluate the relationship of the stone to other organs.…”
Section: Pcnlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good imaging assessment before surgery is essential for surgical planning. CT remains the gold standard for diagnosing urolithiasis, with the advantages of being readily available, having higher diagnostic accuracy, faster imaging acquisition and shorter evaluation time . CT also can evaluate the relationship of the stone to other organs.…”
Section: Pcnlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It found applicability in visualising pathological changes caused by stones in the urinary tract of paediatric and pregnant patients owing to its superior soft tissue contrast and for it does not carries risk associated with ionizing radiations [38,50] , until high doses of paramagnetic contrast were found to be teratogenic [44] . But it has proved to be a safer alternative with no mandatory requirement for administration of contrast media [38] .…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known to have sensitivity and specificity of 96-100% and accuracy of 96-98% [2,36,42,43] . It has advantage of providing information about the stone composition, extent of obstruction, renal anatomy and physiology and any extra-urological or alternative causes of flank pain such as appendi citis, pancreatitis and gynaecologic aberrations [18,44] . The only drawback of this technique is the high amount of ionising radiations required for imaging that limits its use majorly in pregnant women and children.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations